HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dobermann, A. Articles by Ping, J. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Dobermann, A. Articles by Ping, J. L. Agricola Articles by Dobermann, A. Articles by Ping, J. L. Related Collections Geostatistics Data Management Site-Specific Analysis Spatial Distribution Statistics

PRECISION AGRICULTURE

Geostatistical Integration of Yield Monitor Data and Remote Sensing Improves Yield Maps

Dep. of Agron. and Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915, USA

^* Corresponding author (adobermann2{at}unl.edu).

Received for publication April 17, 2003. Grain yield maps must accurately display general yield patterns as well as details of local yield variation. Different geostatistical procedures for creating interpolated yield maps by integrating yield data with remotely sensed vegetation indices (VI) were evaluated. Yield monitor data and a multispectral satellite image at 4-m spatial resolution were collected in an irrigated maize (Zea mays L.) field and a rainfed soybean [Glycine max. (L.) Merr.] field. Ordinary kriging (OK), cokriging (CK), simple kriging with varying local means (SKLM), and kriging with external drift (KED) were compared using grain yield as primary variable and three different VI as secondary variables. At both sites, SKLM performed best in terms of the precision of grain yield maps and maps that depicted true yield patterns. Utilizing the most suitable vegetation index at each site and SKLM as interpolation method, the root mean squared error of yield predictions was increased by nearly 20% over OK. Methods such as KED or CK resulted in only small improvement of yield maps over those obtained with OK. Utilizing the satellite image decreased errors associated with yield monitor operations and allowed better prediction in areas where no reliable yield measurements were available. Due to the robust nature of modeling the relationship between primary and one or more secondary variables, the SKLM method has considerable potential for use in commercial precision-farming software. Future efforts on improving yield mapping should concentrate on obtaining improved yield monitor data and imagery and developing yield-sensitive VI for high-yielding crops.

Abbreviations: CK, cokriging • CV, coefficient of variation • GARI, green atmospherically resistant vegetation index • GNDVI, green normalized difference vegetation index • KED, kriging with external drift • LAI, leaf area index • MAE, mean absolute error, ME, mean error • NDVI, normalized difference vegetation • NIR, near infrared • OK, ordinary kriging • RI, relative improvement over ordinary kriging • RMSE, root mean squared error • SKLM, simple kriging with varying local means • VI, vegetation indices