HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baker, D. A. Articles by Pan, W. L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baker, D. A. Articles by Pan, W. L. Agricola Articles by Baker, D. A. Articles by Pan, W. L. Related Collections Best Management Practices Dryland Cropping Systems Crop Models Production Agriculture Nitrogen

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT

Economically Optimal Nitrogen Fertilization for Yield and Protein in Hard Red Spring Wheat

^a Dep. of Agric. and Resour. Econ., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6210
^b USDA-ARS, Pullman, WA 99164
^c Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6420

^* Corresponding author (dlyoung{at}wsu.edu).

Received for publication September 23, 2002. This analysis determines profit-maximizing N fertilization levels of hard red spring wheat (HRSW) (Triticum aestivum L.) for various wheat prices, N prices, and protein-based HRSW price premium/discount (P/D) structures for southeastern Washington data. Fertilizer response data consisting of rates of N fertilization (kg ha^–1), grain yield (kg ha^–1), and grain protein (g kg^–1) were used to statistically estimate regression relationships that predicted yield and protein in response to N. Experiments were located near Pullman, WA (550 mm average annual precipitation). All predicted net return maximizing N, protein, and yield levels were within the data range. Increasing P/D incentives for protein increased optimal N, the expected economic result. At the high P/D structures, the P/D structure dominated N and wheat prices in determining optimal N application levels. Overall, net return–maximizing yields varied only modestly with changes in both N and wheat price in this data set. However, in all scenarios, as P/D incentives increased, net return–maximizing N levels were beyond the level that resulted in maximum yield. At the two lowest P/D structures, which provided the lowest reward for protein, it was most profitable to fertilize for slightly less than 140 g kg^–1 expected protein. These results indicate that it is not always profitable to use 14% protein as an N fertilization goal.

Abbreviations: CT, conventional tillage • HRSW, hard red spring wheat • NT, no-tillage • P/D, premium/discount