Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Moraghan, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Moraghan, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Moraghan, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Smith, L. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Sugarbeet
Right arrow Nitrogen
Published in Agron. J. 95:1560-1565 (2003).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

PRODUCTION PAPERS

Sugarbeet Growth as Affected by Wheat Residues and Nitrogen Fertilization

John T. Moraghan*,a, Albert L. Simsb and Larry J. Smithb

a Soil Sci. Dep., North Dakota State Univ., Fargo, ND 58102
b Univ. of Minnesota, Northwest Res. and Outreach Cent., 2900 University Ave., Crookston, MN 56716

* Corresponding author (John.Moraghan{at}ndsu.nodak.edu).

Received for publication October 3, 2002. Little is known about how low-N, mature wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) straw and high-N, postharvest volunteer wheat growth from the previous year influence N fertilizer requirements for sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.). This 2-yr field study examined how wheat straw (3.36 and 6.72 Mg ha-1; 3.5 g N kg-1 in 2000 and 8.0 g N kg-1 in 2001), preflowering wheat residues (2.1 to 4.2 Mg ha-1; 29.1 to 44.7 g N kg-1), and urea (0 to 225 kg N ha-1), fall-applied and incorporated, affected sugarbeet growth. The previous crop was wheat, and wheat straw was removed from the experimental sites subsequent to the grain harvest. Sugar yields were decreased 10% by application of 3.36 Mg ha-1 straw and 25% by 6.72 Mg ha-1 straw in 2000. The corresponding 2001 sugar decreases were 13 and 19%, respectively. Application of 45 kg ha-1 urea N largely overcame the detrimental effect from 3.36 Mg ha-1 straw but only partially overcame the detrimental effect from 6.72 Mg ha-1 straw in both experiments. Plant N, petiole NO3–N, and soil inorganic N (NH4–N + NO3–N) data all indicated that incorporation of low-N mature wheat straw decreased availability of soil N, probably due to net N immobilization associated with straw decomposition. In contrast to mature wheat straw, application and incorporation of high-N, preflowering wheat residues increased recoverable sugar yields in both years. Removal of straw after a wheat crop reduces the N fertilizer requirement for a subsequent sugarbeet crop.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.