HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Green, S. Articles by Clothier, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Green, S. Articles by Clothier, B. Agricola Articles by Green, S. Articles by Clothier, B. Related Collections Heat Movement Models Crop Physiology & Metabolism Crop Models Plant Analysis Plant and Environment Interactions

SYMPOSIUM PAPERS

Modeling Light Interception and Transpiration of Apple Tree Canopies

Environ. and Risk Manage. Group, HortResearch Inst., Private Bag 11-030, Palmerston North, New Zealand

^* Corresponding author (sgreen{at}hortresearch.co.nz).

Received for publication November 6, 2002. Sap flow in the trunk of two different-sized apple trees [Malus sylvestris (L.) Mill. var. domestica (Borkh.) Mansf. cv. Splendour/MM.106 and Braeburn/M.9] was measured using the compensation heat-pulse method. Supporting measurements were made of the total photosynthetic photon flux (Q_P) and the total all-wave radiation (Q_N) absorbed by each tree. These data were used to test the output from a three-dimensional model of light interception that approximated the orchard as an array of nonoverlapping, truncated ellipsoids, with each tree having a uniform density of green leaves that were randomly distributed within the canopy volume. Experimental observations, together with model predictions, were used to demonstrate how transpiration responds to changes in the aerial environment. Model testing was rigorous in the sense that the model was compared against complete and independent data collected on the same time scale. Agreement between measured and modeled values was generally very good; all correlation coefficients were large (r² > 0.95), and the linear relationship between measurements and simulations of Q_P, Q_N, and transpiration has a slope that was within 5% of 1:1. A sensitivity analysis revealed that light interception was influenced most by changes in leaf area and leaf optical properties while transpiration was influenced most by changes in leaf area and leaf conductance. On a leaf-area basis, results from the Braeburn tree (leaf area = 8.65 m²) were very similar to those from the larger Splendour tree (leaf area = 35.5 m²). A smaller, more compact fruit tree is more efficient at intercepting the sun's energy, yet it may require more irrigation water per hectare to sustain productivity.

Abbreviations: PAR, photosynthetically active radiation • PPF, photosynthetic photon flux • Q_N, total all-wave radiation • Q_P, total photosynthetic photon flux • 3-D, three dimensional