HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Hacke, U. G. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Hacke, U. G. Agricola Articles by Sperry, J. S. Articles by Hacke, U. G. Related Collections Water Stress Crop Physiology & Metabolism Plant and Soil Interactions Plant and Environment Interactions

SYMPOSIUM PAPERS

Xylem Hydraulics and the Soil–Plant–Atmosphere Continuum

Opportunities and Unresolved Issues

Biol. Dep., Univ. of Utah, 257 S, 1400E, Salt Lake City, UT 84112. Financial support from USAID and NSF (IBN-0112213)

^* Corresponding author (sperry{at}biology.utah.edu).

Received for publication July 23, 2002. Soil and xylem are similar hydraulically. An unsaturated conductivity curve for soil is called a vulnerability curve for xylem—but the underlying physical basis is the same. Thus, any transport model that treats unsaturated soil conductivity would benefit by also incorporating the analogous xylem vulnerability curves. This is especially the case for crop plants, which as a group have relatively vulnerable xylem. Although the cohesion–tension mechanism for xylem transport has withstood recent challenges, a number of gaps remain in our understanding of xylem hydraulics. These include the extent and mechanism of cavitation reversal and thus hysteresis in the vulnerability curve, the structural basis for differences in air entry pressure (=cavitation pressure) for different xylem types, a quantitative model of xylem conductivity, and a mechanistic understanding of how stomata regulate plant water status. Improving the representation of xylem hydraulics in models of crop water use is necessary to achieve a mechanistic link between soil water availability and canopy water use. An important additional knowledge gap concerns the hydraulics of the living tissues of absorbing roots and transpiring leaves, which are more complex than in xylem and less amenable to mechanistic modeling at present.

Abbreviations: cryo-SEM, freezing-stage scanning electron microscopy • SPAC, soil–plant–atmosphere continuum • , water potential

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T.W.J. Scheenen, F.J. Vergeldt, A.M. Heemskerk, and H. Van As Intact Plant Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Study Dynamics in Long-Distance Sap Flow and Flow-Conducting Surface Area Plant Physiology, June 1, 2007; 144(2): 1157 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. R. Ahuja, L. Ma, and D. J. Timlin Trans-Disciplinary Soil Physics Research Critical to Synthesis and Modeling of Agricultural Systems Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., February 2, 2006; 70(2): 311 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]