HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ping, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Ping, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Agricola Articles by Ping, J. L. Articles by Dobermann, A. Related Collections Spatial Distribution Statistics Geostatistics Maize Management Data Management Site-Specific Analysis

SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT

Creating Spatially Contiguous Yield Classes for Site-Specific Management

Dep. of Agron. and Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915

^* Corresponding author (adobermann2{at}unl.edu).

Received for publication January 21, 2003. Annual yield maps are spatially fragmented because of random variation caused by crop management as well as measurement errors. Two approaches for creating maps of spatially contiguous yield classes were evaluated at two irrigated sites. In the first approach, prior-classification interpolation (PCI), grid size was increased from 4, 8, 16, and 32 to 64 m by kriging interpolation before cluster analysis used for mapping yield classes. Choosing a coarse resolution (>16 m) for yield interpolation before spatial classification resulted in maps that did not accurately depict yield patterns, significant decline of the yield variance accounted for, and loss of resolution in areas of sharp yield transitions caused by irrigation or near the field borders. In the second approach, postclassification filtering (PCF), cluster analysis of mean relative yield was conducted on the smallest grid size (4 m), and the classification results were postprocessed using a spatial filtering algorithm with window sizes that were equivalent to the 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-m grid sizes used in PCI. This procedure removed erroneous map fragmentation and created maps of contiguous yield classes while preserving the class means and general yield patterns at high spatial resolution. Window sizes for spatial filtering of yield maps should be in the 30- to 60-m range. Landscape pattern metrics may offer new potential for assessing mapping techniques as well as comparing agricultural production fields with regard to ranking their relative opportunities for site-specific crop management.

Abbreviations: AI, aggregation index • CONTAG, contagion index • CV, coefficient of variation • FUZ, nonhierarchical fuzzy-k-means cluster analysis • Kw, weighted Kappa coefficient • MCA, mean core area per patch • PCF, postclassification filtering • PCI, prior-classification interpolation • PD, patch density • RVc, average relative yield variance • RV_j, proportion of yield variability in one year accounted for by the classification • SPLIT, splitting index • SSCM, site-specific crop management • TCA, total core area • WAR, hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward's method

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. L. Ping, R. B. Ferguson, and A. Dobermann Site-Specific Nitrogen and Plant Density Management in Irrigated Maize Agron. J., June 23, 2008; 100(4): 1193 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. C. Simbahan, A. Dobermann, and J. L. Ping Screening Yield Monitor Data Improves Grain Yield Maps Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1091 - 1102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Dobermann and J. L. Ping Geostatistical Integration of Yield Monitor Data and Remote Sensing Improves Yield Maps Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 285 - 297. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]