Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ping, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dobermann, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Ping, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dobermann, A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Ping, J. L.
Right arrow Articles by Dobermann, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Geostatistics
Right arrow Data Management
Right arrow Site-Specific Analysis
Right arrow Spatial Distribution
Right arrow Maize Management
Right arrow Statistics
Published in Agron. J. 95:1121-1131 (2003).
© American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA

SITE-SPECIFIC MANAGEMENT

Creating Spatially Contiguous Yield Classes for Site-Specific Management

J. L. Ping and A. Dobermann*

Dep. of Agron. and Hortic., Univ. of Nebraska, P.O. Box 830915, Lincoln, NE 68583-0915

* Corresponding author (adobermann2{at}unl.edu).

Received for publication January 21, 2003. Annual yield maps are spatially fragmented because of random variation caused by crop management as well as measurement errors. Two approaches for creating maps of spatially contiguous yield classes were evaluated at two irrigated sites. In the first approach, prior-classification interpolation (PCI), grid size was increased from 4, 8, 16, and 32 to 64 m by kriging interpolation before cluster analysis used for mapping yield classes. Choosing a coarse resolution (>16 m) for yield interpolation before spatial classification resulted in maps that did not accurately depict yield patterns, significant decline of the yield variance accounted for, and loss of resolution in areas of sharp yield transitions caused by irrigation or near the field borders. In the second approach, postclassification filtering (PCF), cluster analysis of mean relative yield was conducted on the smallest grid size (4 m), and the classification results were postprocessed using a spatial filtering algorithm with window sizes that were equivalent to the 8-, 16-, 32-, and 64-m grid sizes used in PCI. This procedure removed erroneous map fragmentation and created maps of contiguous yield classes while preserving the class means and general yield patterns at high spatial resolution. Window sizes for spatial filtering of yield maps should be in the 30- to 60-m range. Landscape pattern metrics may offer new potential for assessing mapping techniques as well as comparing agricultural production fields with regard to ranking their relative opportunities for site-specific crop management.

Abbreviations: AI, aggregation index • CONTAG, contagion index • CV, coefficient of variation • FUZ, nonhierarchical fuzzy-k-means cluster analysis • Kw, weighted Kappa coefficient • MCA, mean core area per patch • PCF, postclassification filtering • PCI, prior-classification interpolation • PD, patch density • RVc, average relative yield variance • RVj, proportion of yield variability in one year accounted for by the classification • SPLIT, splitting index • SSCM, site-specific crop management • TCA, total core area • WAR, hierarchical cluster analysis using Ward's method




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. M. Kyveryga, A. M. Blackmer, and J. Zhang
Characterizing and Classifying Variability in Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Fertilization on Subfield and Field Scales
Agron. J., February 4, 2009; 101(2): 269 - 277.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Ping, R. B. Ferguson, and A. Dobermann
Site-Specific Nitrogen and Plant Density Management in Irrigated Maize
Agron. J., June 23, 2008; 100(4): 1193 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. C. Simbahan, A. Dobermann, and J. L. Ping
Screening Yield Monitor Data Improves Grain Yield Maps
Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1091 - 1102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Dobermann and J. L. Ping
Geostatistical Integration of Yield Monitor Data and Remote Sensing Improves Yield Maps
Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 285 - 297.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.