HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (16) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Scharf, P. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Scharf, P. C. Agricola Articles by Lory, J. A. Articles by Scharf, P. C. Related Collections Best Management Practices Nitrogen Maize Nutrient Management Soil Fertility and Productivity Maize Management

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT

Yield Goal versus Delta Yield for Predicting Fertilizer Nitrogen Need in Corn

Dep. of Agron., 210 Waters Hall, Univ. of Missouri–Columbia, Columbia, MO 65211

^* Corresponding author (loryj{at}missouri.edu)

Received for publication May 16, 2002. Fertilizer N needs of corn (Zea mays L.) vary widely both among and within fields. Many states use yield goal to help determine differences in fertilizer N need, but some states have questioned yield goal–derived recommendations because of the poor correlation of yield with fertilizer N need. In this study, data from 298 previously reported experiments in five states (Illinois, Minnesota, Missouri, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin) were combined to evaluate fertilizer N response of corn. Corn grain yield at the economically optimum N rate (EONR) was positively but poorly correlated with EONR (r² = 0.02). This was consistent with others who have observed that maximum or optimum economic yield is a poor predictor of EONR. Our analysis indicated N supplied by the soil and previous management reduced N need from that predicted by yield alone at most locations. Delta yield (grain yield at optimum N rate minus grain yield of the control) was a much better predictor of EONR at these same locations (r² = 0.47). A theoretically derived equation based on the delta yield concept was similarly capable of predicting EONR for corn. These results indicate that fertilizer recommendation systems that rely solely on yield or ignore yield entirely are limited to explaining less than 50% of the variation in EONR for corn. Farmers should be encouraged to monitor delta yield as a more effective indicator of EONR than actual yield. Greater understanding of the delta yield concept is needed before relying on it to predict fertilizer N requirements.

Abbreviations: EONR, economically optimum N rate • FNUE, fertilizer N use efficiency • N_f, estimated economically optimum N rate • N_s, soil N • Y_{g 0N}, grain yield with no fertilizer N applied • Y_{g OPTN}, grain yield at the economically optimum N rate • _YgFN, delta yield, the yield increase due to application of fertilizer N

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. A. Hernandez and D. J. Mulla Estimating Uncertainty of Economically Optimum Fertilizer Rates Agron. J., September 1, 2008; 100(5): 1221 - 1229. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. M. Laboski, J. E. Sawyer, D. T. Walters, L. G. Bundy, R. G. Hoeft, G. W. Randall, and T. W. Andraski Evaluation of the Illinois Soil Nitrogen Test in the North Central Region of the United States Agron. J., June 16, 2008; 100(4): 1070 - 1076. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Cui, X. Chen, Y. Miao, F. Zhang, Q. Sun, J. Schroder, H. Zhang, J. Li, L. Shi, J. Xu, et al. On-Farm Evaluation of the Improved Soil Nmin-based Nitrogen Management for Summer Maize in North China Plain Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 517 - 525. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K.-I. Kim, D. E. Clay, C. G. Carlson, S. A. Clay, and T. Trooien Do Synergistic Relationships between Nitrogen and Water Influence the Ability of Corn to Use Nitrogen Derived from Fertilizer and Soil? Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 551 - 556. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Solari, J. Shanahan, R. Ferguson, J. Schepers, and A. Gitelson Active Sensor Reflectance Measurements of Corn Nitrogen Status and Yield Potential Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 571 - 579. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Khan, R. L. Mulvaney, T. R. Ellsworth, and C. W. Boast The Myth of Nitrogen Fertilization for Soil Carbon Sequestration J. Environ. Qual., October 24, 2007; 36(6): 1821 - 1832. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Hong, P. C. Scharf, J. G. Davis, N. R. Kitchen, and K. A. Sudduth Economically Optimal Nitrogen Rate Reduces Soil Residual Nitrate J. Environ. Qual., January 25, 2007; 36(2): 354 - 362. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. D. Williams, C. R. Crozier, J. G. White, R. P. Sripada, and D. A. Crouse Comparison of Soil Nitrogen Tests for Corn Fertilizer Recommendations in the Humid Southeastern USA Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2007; 71(1): 171 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. C. Scharf, N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, and J. G. Davis Spatially Variable Corn Yield is a Weak Predictor of Optimal Nitrogen Rate Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 27, 2006; 70(6): 2154 - 2160. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. Mulvaney, S. A. Khan, and T. R. Ellsworth Need for a Soil-Based Approach in Managing Nitrogen Fertilizers for Profitable Corn Production Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 172 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]