Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, C. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Miller, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by McDonald, C. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Legumes
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Dryland Cropping Systems
Right arrow Nitrogen
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Right arrow Crop Ecology
Agronomy Journal 95:980-986 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy

PULSE CROPS

Pulse Crops for the Northern Great Plains

II. Cropping Sequence Effects on Cereal, Oilseed, and Pulse Crops

P. R. Miller*,a, Y. Ganb, B. G. McConkeyb and C. L. McDonaldb

a Dep. of Land Resour. and Environ. Sci., Montana State Univ., P.O. Box 173120, Bozeman, MT 59717-3120
b Semiarid Prairie Agric. Res. Cent., Agric. and Agri-Food Can., Swift Current, SK, Canada S9H 3X2

* Corresponding author (pmiller{at}montana.edu)

Received for publication May 6, 2002. To optimize cropping system benefits from pulse crops, it is important to understand their effects on subsequent crops. The objective of this study was to compare the effects of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.), and pea (Pisum sativum L.) stubbles on yield and quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), mustard (Brassica juncea L.) or canola (B. napus L.), and lentil or pea when grown on soils with clay and loam textures. This study was conducted between 1996 and 1999 in southwestern Saskatchewan. Rotational benefits of pulse crops (chickpea, lentil, and pea) to wheat appeared more consistent on the clay than the silt loam soil. Adjusting fertilizer N rates to account for estimated total N contribution from the previous pulse crop effectively neutralized the benefits on wheat yield and protein compared with the effects following mustard. Canola or mustard productivity was occasionally greater when grown on pea or lentil stubbles compared with mustard and wheat stubbles. The yield increase was attributed to increased available water. Under drier-than-normal conditions, pea yields were highest when grown on wheat stubble. Wheat productivity was least when grown on its own stubble. Pea and lentil provided rotational benefits to wheat, mustard, and canola and benefitted most from being grown in wheat stubble, indicating a strong fit for diversified cropping systems on the semiarid northern Great Plains.

Abbreviations: WUE, water use efficiency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. W. Cutforth, S. M. McGinn, K. E. McPhee, and P. R. Miller
Adaptation of Pulse Crops to the Changing Climate of the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1684 - 1699.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. L. Lemke, Z. Zhong, C. A. Campbell, and R. Zentner
Can Pulse Crops Play a Role in Mitigating Greenhouse Gases from North American Agriculture?
Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1719 - 1725.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. L. Tanaka, J. M. Krupinsky, S. D. Merrill, M. A. Liebig, and J. D. Hanson
Dynamic Cropping Systems for Sustainable Crop Production in the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 904 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. M. Krupinsky, D. L. Tanaka, S. D. Merrill, M. A. Liebig, M. T. Lares, and J. D. Hanson
Crop Sequence Effects on Leaf Spot Diseases of No-Till Spring Wheat
Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 912 - 920.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. D. Hanson, M. A. Liebig, S. D. Merrill, D. L. Tanaka, J. M. Krupinsky, and D. E. Stott
Dynamic Cropping Systems: Increasing Adaptability Amid an Uncertain Future
Agron. J., June 5, 2007; 99(4): 939 - 943.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. C. Nielsen, P. W. Unger, and P. R. Miller
Efficient Water Use in Dryland Cropping Systems in the Great Plains
Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 364 - 372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. R. Miller and J. A. Holmes
Cropping Sequence Effects of Four Broadleaf Crops on Four Cereal Crops in the Northern Great Plains
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 189 - 200.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. S. Sharratt and R. W. Gesch
Water Use and Root Length Density of Cuphea spp. Influenced by Row Spacing and Sowing Date
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1475 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.