|
|
||||||||
a Texas A&M Univ. Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., R.R. 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79403
b Texas A&M Univ. Texas Coop. Ext., R.R. 3, Box 213AA, Lubbock, TX 79403
* Corresponding author (k-bronson{at}tamu.edu)
Received for publication April 26, 2002. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) response to P fertilizer can vary within fields, making P recommendations difficult. Phosphorus response may be more predictable with variable-rate fertilization, which matches soil test P and P fertilizer rate on a site-specific basis. Our first objective was to determine the effect of landscape position and soil series on cotton P accumulation, lint yields, and P fertilizer response on two irrigated cotton sites in the Southern High Plains of Texas. The second objective was to compare variable-rate P, blanket-rate P, and zero P applications. Mehlich-3 P levels ranged from 8 to 25 mg P kg-1 at Lamesa, and from 12 to 23 mg P kg-1 at Ropesville. Phosphorus fertilizer was not recommended when Mehlich-3 P >33 mg P kg-1. In both years at Lamesa, P accumulation at early squaring and lint yields were greater in the bottomslope than in the south-facing sideslope. Phosphorus fertilizer did not affect lint yields at Lamesa in 2000. In 2001, Lamesa lint yields responded to variable-rate and blanket-rate P in the south-facing sideslope only, which had just 8 mg P kg-1. At Ropesville in 2000, early P accumulation, biomass and lint yields responded to P on a calcareous soil but not on a noncalcareous soil. In all cases, yields were similar between variable-rate and blanket-rate P. Thirty-eight percent less P was applied with variable-rate than blanket-rate treatments in 3 of 4 site-yr. However, more research is needed to determine if fertilizer savings are consistent enough to offset the greater costs of variable-rate P fertilization.
Abbreviations: df, degrees of freedom GPS, global positioning system LEPA, low energy precision application
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. D. Booker, K. F. Bronson, C. L. Trostle, J. W. Keeling, and A. Malapati Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizer and Residual Response in Cotton-Sorghum and Cotton-Cotton Sequences Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 607 - 613. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Bronson, J. D. Booker, J. P. Bordovsky, J. W. Keeling, T. A. Wheeler, R. K. Boman, M. N. Parajulee, E. Segarra, and R. L. Nichols Site-Specific Irrigation and Nitrogen Management for Cotton Production in the Southern High Plains Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 212 - 219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Terra, J. N. Shaw, D. W. Reeves, R. L. Raper, E. van Santen, E. B. Schwab, and P. L. Mask Soil Management and Landscape Variability Affects Field-Scale Cotton Productivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 98 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. F. Bronson, J. D. Booker, J. W. Keeling, R. K. Boman, T. A. Wheeler, R. J. Lascano, and R. L. Nichols Cotton Canopy Reflectance at Landscape Scale as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilization Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 654 - 660. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||