|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Agron., Univ. of Kentucky, N-122 Agric. Sci. North, Lexington, KY 40546-0091
b Dep. of Biosyst. and Agric. Eng., Univ. of Kentucky, 218 C.E. Barnhart, Lexington, KY 40546-0276
c John Deere Agric. Manage. Solutions, John Deere and Co., 4140 NW 114th St., Urbandale, IA 50322
* Corresponding author (mueller{at}uky.edu)
Received for publication April 23, 2001. Sensors exist that allow rapid mapping of bulk soil electrical conductivity (EC); however, the utility of these sensors for Kentucky producers is unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the nature and the causes of soil EC variability and to make a first assessment of its potential utility in Kentucky, particularly for fields containing soils derived from limestone residuum overlain by loess. Various geostatistical, correlation, and regression analyses were conducted at seven locations to examine EC map variability. Sensor drift and errors associated with changes in coulter depth were minimal. Bulk soil EC related fairly well with clay content across locations and sample dates (r2 = 0.40); however, many site- and time-specific correlations were better. Clay (maximum r2 = 0.75), moisture content (maximum r2 = 0.76), Ca (maximum r2 = 0.67), and Mg (maximum r2 = 0.64) were positively correlated with EC, and depth to argillic or cambic horizon (maximum r2 = 0.62), depth to fragipan (maximum r2 = 0.81), and depth to bedrock (maximum r2 = 0.32) were negatively correlated with EC. A multiple-regression model (R2 = 0.70) was developed to predict EC that included nine factors: clay, sand, soil moisture, buffer pH, base saturation, Ca, soil temperature, depth to cambic and argillic horizon, and slope. Soil EC variability was spatially structured, and spatial patterns were stable over time; however, the degree to which these patterns could be observed depended on the mapping procedures used. Our research suggested that EC mapping may have utility for Kentucky farmers.
Abbreviations: BpH, buffer pH BS, base saturation CEC, cation exchange capacity DEM, digital elevation model EC, electrical conductivity GPS, global positioning system RSV, relative structural variability
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. S. Grigera, R. A. Drijber, K. M. Eskridge, and B. J. Wienhold Soil Microbial Biomass Relationships with Organic Matter Fractions in a Nebraska Corn Field Mapped using Apparent Electrical Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 3, 2006; 70(5): 1480 - 1488. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Terra, J. N. Shaw, D. W. Reeves, R. L. Raper, E. van Santen, E. B. Schwab, and P. L. Mask Soil Management and Landscape Variability Affects Field-Scale Cotton Productivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., December 2, 2005; 70(1): 98 - 107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. K. Jung, N. R. Kitchen, K. A. Sudduth, R. J. Kremer, and P. P. Motavalli Relationship of Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity to Claypan Soil Properties Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., May 6, 2005; 69(3): 883 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Guretzky, K. J. Moore, C. L. Burras, and E. C. Brummer Distribution of Legumes along Gradients of Slope and Soil Electrical Conductivity in Pastures Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 547 - 555. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||