Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Porter, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crookston, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Porter, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crookston, R. K.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Porter, P. M.
Right arrow Articles by Crookston, R. K.
Related Collections
Right arrow Sustainable Agriculture
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Systems
Right arrow Production Agriculture
Agronomy Journal 95:233-244 (2003)
© 2003 American Society of Agronomy

PRODUCTION PAPER

Organic and Other Management Strategies with Two- and Four-Year Crop Rotations in Minnesota

Paul M. Porter*,a, Dave R. Hugginsb, Catherine A. Perilloc, Steven R. Quiringd and R. Kent Crookstone

a Dep. of Agron. and Plant Genet., 1991 Buford Circle, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108-6026
b USDA-ARS, 233 Johnson Hall, Pullman, WA 99164-6421
c Dep. of Crop and Soil Sci., Washington State Univ., Pullman, WA 99164-6420
d Southwest Res. and Outreach Cent., Lamberton, MN 56152
e College of Biol. and Agric., Brigham Young Univ., 301 WIDB, PO Box 25250, Provo, UT 84602-5250

* Corresponding author (pporter{at}umn.edu)

Received for publication October 2, 2001. In the USA, the corn (Zea mays L.)–soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation depends on high levels of external inputs. Few research data exist comparing conventional production practices with practices involving reduced external inputs and expanded rotations. Two trials initiated in 1989 near Lamberton, MN, evaluated a 2-yr corn–soybean rotation and a 4-yr corn–soybean–oat (Avena sativa L.)/alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.)–alfalfa rotation under four management strategies. The four management strategies were zero (ZI), low (LI), high (HI), and organic (OI) inputs. One trial (V1) was on land with a history of no fertilizer and pesticide usage. The other trial (V2) was on land with a history of conventional fertilizer and pesticide usage. From 1993 through 1999, average corn yield in the 2-yr HI strategy was 8.96 Mg ha-1 in V1 and 8.72 Mg ha-1 in V2. Corn yield in the 4-yr HI strategy was 4% less than in the 2-yr HI strategy in V1, whereas in V2, the yields were not different. Soybean yield in the 2-yr HI strategy was 2.90 Mg ha-1 in V1 and 2.74 Mg ha-1 in V2. Soybean yield in the 4-yr compared with the 2-yr HI strategy was 3% greater in V1 and 6% greater in V2. These results suggest soybean was more responsive than corn to the expanded rotation length in the HI strategy. Corn yield in the 4-yr OI strategy compared with the 2-yr HI strategy was 9% less in V1 and 7% less in V2 while soybean yield in the 4-yr OI strategy compared with the 2-yr HI strategy was 19% less in V1 and 16% less in V2. These results suggest that yield of organically produced soybean was reduced to a greater extent than that of organically produced corn relative to conventional production practices. By comparing yields of the 2- and 4-yr rotations for each management strategy, this research documents the beneficial yield effects of the expanded crop rotation, which can be masked by external inputs in the LI and HI treatments.

Abbreviations: HI, high purchased input(s) • LI, low purchased input(s) • OI, organic input(s) • SCN, soybean cyst nematode • ZI, zero input(s)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
J. L. Capper, E. Castaneda-Gutierrez, R. A. Cady, and D. E. Bauman
The environmental impact of recombinant bovine somatotropin (rbST) use in dairy production
PNAS, July 15, 2008; 105(28): 9668 - 9673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. Liebman, L. R. Gibson, D. N. Sundberg, A. H. Heggenstaller, P. R. Westerman, C. A. Chase, R. G. Hartzler, F. D. Menalled, A. S. Davis, and P. M. Dixon
Agronomic and Economic Performance Characteristics of Conventional and Low-External-Input Cropping Systems in the Central Corn Belt
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 600 - 610.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. F. Stanger and J. G. Lauer
Corn Grain Yield Response to Crop Rotation and Nitrogen over 35 Years
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 643 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. A. Cavigelli, J. R. Teasdale, and A. E. Conklin
Long-Term Agronomic Performance of Organic and Conventional Field Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Region
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 785 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
R. E. Lorenzana and R. Bernardo
Genetic Correlation between Corn Performance in Organic and Conventional Production Systems
Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 903 - 910.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Posner, J. O. Baldock, and J. L. Hedtcke
Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trials: I. Productivity 1990-2002
Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 253 - 260.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Archer, A. A. Jaradat, J. M-F. Johnson, S. L. Weyers, R. W. Gesch, F. Forcella, and H. K. Kludze
Crop Productivity and Economics during the Transition to Alternative Cropping Systems
Agron. J., October 15, 2007; 99(6): 1538 - 1547.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
C. A. Rotz, G. H. Kamphuis, H. D. Karsten, and R. D. Weaver
Organic Dairy Production Systems in Pennsylvania: A Case Study Evaluation
J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3961 - 3979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
K. A. Oquist, J. S. Strock, and D. J. Mulla
Influence of Alternative and Conventional Farming Practices on Subsurface Drainage and Water Quality
J. Environ. Qual., June 27, 2007; 36(4): 1194 - 1204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vadose Zone JHome page
K. A. Oquist, J. S. Strock, and D. J. Mulla
Influence of Alternative and Conventional Management Practices on Soil Physical and Hydraulic Properties
Vadose Zone J., March 8, 2006; 5(1): 356 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. Delate and C. A. Cambardella
Agroecosystem Performance during Transition to Certified Organic Grain Production
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1288 - 1298.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. R. Teasdale, R. W. Mangum, J. Radhakrishnan, and M. A. Cavigelli
Weed Seedbank Dynamics in Three Organic Farming Crop Rotations
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1429 - 1435.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2003 by the American Society of Agronomy.