HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Broad, I. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Broad, I. J. Agricola Articles by Hammer, G. L. Articles by Broad, I. J. Related Collections Crop Growth and Development Sorghum Crop Models

SORGHUM

Genotype and Environment Effects on Dynamics of Harvest Index during Grain Filling in Sorghum

^a Agric. Prod. Syst. Res. Unit, Queensland Dep. of Primary Industries, Toowoomba, QLD 4350, Australia
^b School of Land and Food Sci., The Univ. of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia

* Corresponding author (graeme.hammer{at}dpi.qld.gov.au)

Received for publication March 2, 2002. An approach based on a linear rate of increase in harvest index (HI) with time after anthesis has been used as a simple means to predict grain growth and yield in many crop simulation models. When applied to diverse situations, however, this approach has been found to introduce significant error in grain yield predictions. Accordingly, this study was undertaken to examine the stability of the HI approach for yield prediction in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Four field experiments were conducted under nonlimiting water and N conditions. The experiments were sown at times that ensured a broad range in temperature and radiation conditions. Treatments consisted of two population densities and three genotypes varying in maturity. Frequent sequential harvests were used to monitor crop growth, yield, and the dynamics of HI. Experiments varied greatly in yield and final HI. There was also a tendency for lower HI with later maturity. Harvest index dynamics also varied among experiments and, to a lesser extent, among treatments within experiments. The variation was associated mostly with the linear rate of increase in HI and timing of cessation of that increase. The average rate of HI increase was 0.0198 d^-1, but this was reduced considerably (0.0147) in one experiment that matured in cool conditions. The variations found in HI dynamics could be largely explained by differences in assimilation during grain filling and remobilization of preanthesis assimilate. We concluded that this level of variation in HI dynamics limited the general applicability of the HI approach in yield prediction and suggested a potential alternative for testing.

Abbreviations: A-M, anthesis to physiological maturity • E-A, emergence to anthesis • HI, harvest index • LAI, leaf area index

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. O. Sadras and D. B. Egli Seed Size Variation in Grain Crops: Allometric Relationships between Rate and Duration of Seed Growth Crop Sci., March 19, 2008; 48(2): 408 - 416. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. W. White, G. Hoogenboom, and L. A. Hunt A Structured Procedure for Assessing How Crop Models Respond to Temperature Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 426 - 439. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]