Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Adjei, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rechcigl, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Adjei, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rechcigl, J. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Adjei, M. B.
Right arrow Articles by Rechcigl, J. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Plant Nutrition
Right arrow Animal Waste
Agronomy Journal 94:1400-1410 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

BIOSOLIDS

Bahiagrass Production and Nutritive Value as Affected by Domestic Wastewater Residuals

Martin B. Adjei* and Jack E. Rechcigl

Univ. of Florida, Range Cattle Res. and Educ. Center, Ona, FL 33865

* Corresponding author (mbadjei{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu)

Received for publication January 15, 2002. Approximately 70% of Florida's biosolids is land-applied with little supporting agronomic information. This experiment was conducted on bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), on Pomona fine sand soil (sandy, siliceous, hyperthermic Ultic Alaquods), to compare the agronomic value of aerobically digested slurry biosolid, lime-stabilized slurry biosolid, lime-stabilized cake biosolid, and ammonium nitrate all applied to supply 90 or 180 kg N ha-1 vs. an unfertilized control. Forage production (3–5 Mg ha-1 yr-1) was similar for the ammonium nitrate and the slurries in 1998 and 1999, highest for the lime-stabilized slurry in 2000, but always 30% lower for the cake biosolid due to the cake's lower N availability. The slurries and ammonium nitrate gave 50% or more forage and higher spring crude protein (CP) concentration (100–170 g kg-1) than the control (75–110 g kg-1). The CP was improved with ammonium nitrate in early spring, after which, there were no consistent differences in CP or in vitro organic matter digestion (460–600 g kg-1) among N sources. Tissue P (2.0–3.5 g kg-1), Ca (3.0–8.0 g kg-1), and Fe (40–250 mg kg-1) were increased by both biosolid slurries in the spring, whereas tissue Cu (6–15 mg kg-1) and Mn (10–100 mg kg-1) were elevated periodically only by the aerobically digested slurry. Forage was deficient in K and Mn in summer across treatments. Lime-stabilized biosolid could boost bahiagrass production in Florida because it is lower in pathogens, inexpensive, and provides lime and organic matter.

Abbreviations: AM, ammonium nitrate • CB, cake biosolid • Cont, control of no fertilizer • CP, crude protein • SB7, slurry biosolid of pH 7 • SB 11, slurry biosolid of pH 11







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.