|
|
||||||||
a Dep. of Crop Sci., North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7620
b Dep. of Plant Pathol., Box 7619, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-7619
c Peanut Belt Res. Stn., North Carolina Dep. of Agric. and Consumer Serv., Box 220, Lewiston-Woodville, NC 27849
d Upper Coastal Plain Res. Stn., Rt. 2 Box 400, North Carolina Dep. of Agric. and Consumer Serv., Rocky Mount, NC 27801
e Dep. of Agric. and Resour. Econ., Box 8109, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC 27695-8109
* Corresponding author (david_jordan{at}ncsu.edu)
Received for publication April 9, 2001. Research was conducted in North Carolina at two locations from 1997 through 2000 to determine net returns of 10 cropping systems during a 4-yr cropping cycle that included peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.], and corn (Zea mays L.). Cylindrocladium black rot [caused by Cylindrocladium parasiticum] (CBR) increased when soybean was included in the rotation sequence or when peanut was grown continuously. The CBR-resistant cultivar NC 12C increased yield compared with the susceptible cultivar NC 7 when this disease was present. Cotton was a better rotation crop than corn at one of two locations with respect to peanut yield and gross economic value in the final year of the study. Net returns were substantially lower when peanut was marketed for export in the current federal program rather than at the quota price. However, the profitability ranking among cropping systems changed little regardless of marketing system. Crop yield and net return were influenced by crop selection, weather conditions, and commodity prices during the 4 yr.
Abbreviations: CBR, Cylindrocladium black rot CR, corn CT, cotton PN, peanut SB, soybean
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
D. L. Jordan, J. S. Barnes, T. Corbett, C. R. Bogle, P. D. Johnson, B. B. Shew, S. R. Koenning, W. Ye, and R. L. Brandenburg Crop Response to Rotation and Tillage in Peanut-Based Cropping Systems Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1580 - 1586. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. B. Godsey, J. Vitale, J. P. Damicone, J. R. Sholar, J. Nickels, and J. Baker Rotational Effects in Oklahoma Peanut Production: Prospects for Peanut Rotations in the Post-Quota Era Agron. J., August 10, 2007; 99(5): 1238 - 1244. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. S. Tubbs and R. N. Gallaher Conservation Tillage and Herbicide Management for Two Peanut Cultivars Agron. J., March 1, 2005; 97(2): 500 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||