|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cereal Breeding and Biometrics, Univ. of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada N1G 2W1
* Corresponding author (wyan{at}uoguelph.ca; wyan{at}ggebiplot.com)
Received for publication November 16, 2001. Multienvironment trials (MET) are conducted every year for all major crops throughout the world, and best use of the information contained in MET data for cultivar evaluation and recommendation has been an important issue in plant breeding and agricultural research. A genotype main effect plus genotype x environment interaction (GGE) biplot based on MET data allows visualizing (i) the which-won-where pattern of the MET, (ii) the interrelationship among test environments, and (iii) the ranking of genotypes based on both mean performance and stability. Correct visualization of these aspects, however, requires appropriate singular-value (SV) partitioning between the genotype and environment eigenvectors. This paper compares four SV scaling methods. Genotype-focused scaling partitions the entire SV to the genotype eigenvectors; environment-focused scaling partitions the entire SV to the environment eigenvectors; symmetrical scaling splits the SV symmetrically between the genotype and the environment eigenvectors; and equal-space scaling splits the SV such that genotype markers and environment markers take equal biplot space. It is recommended that the genotype-focused scaling be used in visualizing the interrelationship and comparison among genotypes and the environment-focused scaling be used in visualizing the interrelationship and comparison among environments. All scaling methods are equally valid in visualizing the which-won-where pattern of the MET data, but the symmetric scaling is preferred because it has all properties intermediate between the genotype- and the environment-focused scaling methods.
Abbreviations: AEC, average environment coordinates G, genotype main effects GE, genotype x environment interaction GGE, genotype main effects plus genotype x environment interaction effects MET, multienvironment trials PC, principal component SV, singular value
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Mohammadi, A. Amri, and Y. Ansari Biplot Analysis of Rainfed Barley Multienvironment Trials in Iran Agron. J., June 2, 2009; 101(4): 789 - 796. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Fernandez-Aparicio, F. Flores, and D. Rubiales Recognition of root exudates by seeds of broomrape (Orobanche and Phelipanche) species Ann. Bot., February 1, 2009; 103(3): 423 - 431. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Baxevanos, C. Goulas, J. Rossi, and E. Braojos Separation of Cotton Cultivar Testing Sites based on Representativeness and Discriminating Ability Using GGE Biplots Agron. J., August 11, 2008; 100(5): 1230 - 1236. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Sabaghnia, H. Dehghani, and S. H. Sabaghpour Graphic Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Lentil Yield in Iran Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 760 - 764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. L. Roozeboom, W. T. Schapaugh, M. R. Tuinstra, R. L. Vanderlip, and G. A. Milliken Testing Wheat in Variable Environments: Genotype, Environment, Interaction Effects, and Grouping Test Locations Crop Sci., January 16, 2008; 48(1): 317 - 330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-L. Laffont, M. Hanafi, and K. Wright Numerical and Graphical Measures to Facilitate the Interpretation of GGE Biplots Crop Sci., May 31, 2007; 47(3): 990 - 996. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yan, M. S. Kang, B. Ma, S. Woods, and P. L. Cornelius GGE Biplot vs. AMMI Analysis of Genotype-by-Environment Data Crop Sci., March 1, 2007; 47(2): 643 - 653. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. G. Gauch Jr. Statistical Analysis of Yield Trials by AMMI and GGE Crop Sci., May 18, 2006; 46(4): 1488 - 1500. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Dehghani, A. Ebadi, and A. Yousefi Biplot Analysis of Genotype by Environment Interaction for Barley Yield in Iran Agron. J., March 2, 2006; 98(2): 388 - 393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Yan and N. A. Tinker An Integrated Biplot Analysis System for Displaying, Interpreting, and Exploring Genotype x Environment Interaction Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1004 - 1016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Malvar, P. Revilla, A. Butron, B. Gouesnard, A. Boyat, P. Soengas, A. Alvarez, and A. Ordas Performance of Crosses among French and Spanish Maize Populations across Environments Crop Sci., May 6, 2005; 45(3): 1052 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. L. Ma, W. Yan, L. M. Dwyer, J. Fregeau-Reid, H. D. Voldeng, Y. Dion, and H. Nass Graphic Analysis of Genotype, Environment, Nitrogen Fertilizer, and Their Interactions on Spring Wheat Yield Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 169 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |