Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waskom, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waskom, R. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Al-Kaisi, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Waskom, R. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Animal Waste
Right arrow Water Quality
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Air Pollution
Agronomy Journal 94:1156-1162 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

NITROGEN MANAGEMENT

Estimating Ammonia Loss from Sprinkler-Applied Swine Effluent

Mahdi M. Al-Kaisi*,a and Reagan M. Waskomb

a Agronomy Dep., 2104 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011-1010
b Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins, CO 80523-2033

* Corresponding author (malkaisi{at}iastate.edu)

Received for publication June 12, 2001. Volatilization of NH3 from sprinkler-applied effluent is a major N loss pathway in the Great Plains region, but there is disagreement as to how much of the total NH4–N applied in effluent is lost. The objectives of the study were to determine NH3 loss during sprinkler application and from soil and to determine the amount of mineral N available to the crop over a series of swine effluent application rates, effluent sources, and field conditions. A 3-yr study was conducted on fields near swine (Sus scrofa) production operations. A mass balance method was used to estimate N loss during and after effluent application at rates of 1.3, 1.9, and 2.5 cm. Change in inorganic N concentration in effluent captured below the sprinkler was used to estimate volatilization during application, and the change in inorganic N concentration in soil (before and 72 h after application) was used to estimate N loss from soil. Ammonia loss during application ranged from 8 to 27% of the total NH4–N in the effluent due to drift and volatilization. The range of estimated N loss from the soil varied from 24 to 56% of the NH4–N in the applied effluent. The total N loss from both the sprinkler application and the soil ranged from 32 to 83%, with an average loss of approximately 58%. Effluent N concentration did not significantly impact the percent of N lost, while air temperature and wind speed were significant variables in the percent of N lost.

Abbreviations: ET, evapotranspiration • GLM, general linear model • OM, organic matter • RCB, randomized complete block design




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. R. McLaughlin, T. E. Fairbrother, and D. E. Rowe
Nutrient Uptake by Warm-Season Perennial Grasses in a Swine Effluent Spray Field
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 484 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.