HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Brummer, E. C. Articles by Bjork, N. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Brummer, E. C. Articles by Bjork, N. C. Agricola Articles by Brummer, E. C. Articles by Bjork, N. C. Related Collections Forage Management Alfalfa

PRODUCTION PAPER

Agronomic Consequences of Dormant–Nondormant Alfalfa Mixtures

Agron. Dep., Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011

* Corresponding author (brummer{at}iastate.edu)

Received for publication April 23, 2001. The yield of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) during the establishment year is typically less than that from fully established stands. Because nondormant cultivars produce more growth during autumn than dormant cultivars, a mechanism to increase yield during the establishment year in northern areas of the USA could be to mix seed of nondormant and adapted cultivars at planting. The objective of this experiment was to determine if establishment year yield could be improved by seeding dormant–nondormant mixtures without adversely affecting yield in the succeeding year. Two dormant–nondormant mixtures (‘Vernal’–'Mecca II' and ‘5454’–‘5939’) with 10, 30, or 50% of the nondormant cultivar and pure stands of all four cultivars were seeded in field studies near Ames, Nashua, and Castana, IA, in April 1998. Four forage harvests were taken in 1998, including one in late October, and in 1999. Plants were counted in May and October 1998 and in June 1999. Plant numbers among treatments were similar during 1998. Stand mortality in spring 1999 increased as the nondormant percentage increased, except that 10% nondormant plots had slightly more plants than 0% plots. In 1998, total forage yield increased linearly with increasing percentage of nondormant seed, but nutritive value in October 1998 declined slightly with increasing percentages of nondormant seed. In 1999, yield declined linearly as the percentage of nondormant seed increased; plots with 10% nondormant seed yielded less than the pure stands of dormant cultivars. We do not recommend mixing any nondormant seed with adapted dormant cultivars at planting.

Abbreviations: CP, crude protein • FD, fall dormancy • IVDMD, in vitro dry matter digestibility • NDF, neutral detergent fiber

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. E. Frankow-Lindberg, C. Brophy, R. P. Collins, and J. Connolly Biodiversity effects on yield and unsown species invasion in a temperate forage ecosystem Ann. Bot., April 1, 2009; 103(6): 913 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. D. Casler and E. C. Brummer Theoretical Expected Genetic Gains for Among-and-Within-Family Selection Methods in Perennial Forage Crops Crop Sci., May 1, 2008; 48(3): 890 - 902. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Malinowski, W. E. Pinchak, B. A. Kramp, H. Zuo, and T. J. Butler Supplemental Irrigation and Fall Dormancy Effects on Alfalfa Productivity in a Semiarid, Subtropical Climate with a Bimodal Precipitation Pattern Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 621 - 629. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. A. Weishaar, E. C. Brummer, J. J. Volenec, K. J. Moore, and S. Cunningham Improving Winter Hardiness in Nondormant Alfalfa Germplasm Crop Sci., January 1, 2005; 45(1): 60 - 65. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]