HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Articles by Thompson, C. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Articles by Thompson, C. R. Agricola Articles by Schlegel, A. J. Articles by Thompson, C. R. Related Collections Water Use Crop Rotation Systems Dryland Cropping Systems Sorghum Wheat Production Agriculture Tillage Water Conservation

PRODUCTION PAPER

Feasibility of Four-Year Crop Rotations in the Central High Plains

^a Southwest Res.-Ext. Cent., Kansas State Univ., Tribune, KS 67879
^b Southwest Area Ext., Kansas State Univ., Garden City, KS 67846

* Corresponding author (aschlege{at}oznet.ksu.edu)

Received for publication April 26, 2001. In the central Great Plains, there has been an increase in summer crops, such as grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] or corn (Zea mays L.), grown in a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)–summer crop–fallow rotation. This field study quantified the effects of increasing cropping intensity beyond a 3-yr rotation on soil water dynamics and wheat and grain sorghum production and profitability and determined the grain yields necessary to ensure greater profitability over 3-yr rotations. Cropping systems evaluated were wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow (WWSF), wheat–sorghum–sorghum–fallow (WSSF), and continuous wheat (WW). Available soil water (ASW) at wheat planting was 82 mm greater following sorghum than following wheat; however, fallow efficiency decreased from 50% following wheat to 20% following sorghum. At sorghum planting, ASW was 22 to 32 mm greater following wheat than sorghum. Before sorghum, soil water accumulation during fallow was much greater following wheat than sorghum (168 vs. 60 mm). Fallow efficiency was also greater (34 vs. 23%). Wheat yields were 43% (1.2 Mg ha^-1) greater following sorghum than wheat. Grain sorghum yields were 36% (1.5 Mg ha^-1) greater following wheat than sorghum. Production costs were similar for all rotations. The WSSF rotation had the highest net returns, about $95 ha^-1 compared with $92 ha^-1 for a simulated WSF rotation, $76 ha^-1 for WWSF, and $49 ha^-1 for WW. In this study, grain yields required to make 4-yr rotations more profitable than a 3-yr WSF rotation were recrop sorghum yields of 3.5 to 4.0 Mg ha^-1 and recrop wheat yields of 2.5 to 3.0 Mg ha^-1.

Abbreviations: ASW, available soil water • NT, no-till • WCF, wheat–corn–fallow • WF, wheat–fallow • WSF, wheat–sorghum–fallow • WSSF, wheat–sorghum–sorghum–fallow • WUE, water use efficiency • WW, continuous wheat • WWSF, wheat–wheat–sorghum–fallow

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Bandaru, B. A. Stewart, R. L. Baumhardt, S. Ambati, C. A. Robinson, and A. Schlegel Growing Dryland Grain Sorghum in Clumps to Reduce Vegetative Growth and Increase Yield Agron. J., June 27, 2006; 98(4): 1109 - 1120. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. D. Halvorson, D. C. Nielsen, and C. A. Reule Nitrogen Fertilization and Rotation Effects on No-Till Dryland Wheat Production Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1196 - 1201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]