Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Loeppky, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coulman, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Loeppky, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coulman, B. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Loeppky, H. A.
Right arrow Articles by Coulman, B. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Right arrow Nutrient Management
Right arrow Seed Production
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Agronomy Journal 94:450-454 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

SEED

Crop Residue Removal and Nitrogen Fertilization Affects Seed Production in Meadow Bromegrass

Heather A. Loeppky*,a and Bruce E. Coulmanb

a Alberta Agric., Food, and Rural Dev. (AAFRD), 6000 C&E Trail, Lacombe, AB, Canada T4L 1V5
b Agric. and Agri-Food Can. (AAFC), 107 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK, Canada S7N 0X2

* Corresponding author (heather.loeppky{at}gov.ab.ca)

Received for publication May 8, 2000. Seed yield in meadow bromegrass (Bromus riparius Rehm.) declines rapidly after two to three seed crops. This is a critical limitation to economic seed production. Field experiments were conducted at Saskatoon and Outlook, SK, Canada, to determine the influence of residue removal and N fertilization on seed yield. Three N treatments (0, 50, and 100 kg ha-1) were applied in September each year for the first three seed production years, and four residue removal treatments (none, after harvest, October, and after harvest + October) were applied in the second and third seed production years. Residue removal after harvest and N application (100 kg ha-1) increased yield 0 to 572 kg ha-1 in the second seed crop compared with the untreated control. In the third-year seed crop, residue removal increased seed yield 30 to 90 kg ha-1. Application of N fertilizer increased third-year seed yield 90 kg ha-1 at Outlook only. Mean seed yield was reduced in the third compared with the second crop year, regardless of treatment. Residue removal after harvest combined with the application of 100 kg N ha-1 increased the cumulative 2-yr seed yield by 390 to 490 kg ha-1 compared with the untreated control. At the current seed price (Can$2.50 kg-1) and N fertilizer cost (Can$0.66 kg-1) of meadow bromegrass, the additional seed yield from residue removal and 100 kg N ha-1 would provide a net return of Can$975 to Can$1225 ha-1 on an additional investment of <Can$100 ha-1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. D. Holman, C. Hunt, J. Johnson-Maynard, L. VanTassell, and D. Thill
Livestock Use as a Non-Thermal Residue Management Practice in Kentucky Bluegrass Seed Production Systems
Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 203 - 210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.