Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thomison, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobbels, T. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Thomison, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobbels, T. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Thomison, P. R.
Right arrow Articles by Dobbels, T. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Maize
Agronomy Journal 94:290-299 (2002)
© 2002 American Society of Agronomy

PRODUCTION PAPER

TopCross High-Oil Corn Production

Agronomic Performance

Peter R. Thomison*,a, Allen B. Geyera, Larry D. Lotzb, Howard J. Siegristb and Tammy L. Dobbelsb

a Dep. of Hortic. and Crop Sci., The Ohio State Univ., Columbus, OH 43210-1086
b The Ohio State Univ. Ext., Columbus, OH 43210-1086

* Corresponding author (thomison.1{at}osu.edu)

Received for publication January 12, 2001. The TopCross grain production system is rapidly gaining popularity as the preferred method of producing high-oil corn (Zea mays L.). A blend (TC Blend) of two types of corn is planted to produce TopCross high-oil corn (HOC) grain. Limited information is available on the effects of the TopCross system on agronomic traits that may determine the profitability of HOC production. Field experiments and on-farm studies were performed in 1995 to 1999 across a range of production environments in Ohio to compare the agronomic performance of TC Blends with their conventional counterparts (check hybrids). Grain yields of TC Blends averaged across experiments and on-farm studies were 8% less than those of check hybrids. The TC Blends were as tolerant to drought conditions as the check hybrids. Stalk lodging and barrenness were comparable for TC Blends and check hybrids. Little evidence existed that kernel set in TC Blends was reduced by inadequate pollen availability due to the limited number of pollinator plants in the blend. Factors that may contribute to the differences in grain yields between TC Blends and check hybrids included lower plant populations in TC Blends at harvest, competition between the two components of the blend (TC Blend pollinators and male sterile grain parents), and the physiological cost of oil synthesis. The lower grain yield, higher grain moisture content, and lower test weight associated with TC Blends should be considered when determining TopCross HOC production costs, especially if HOC grain is being produced under contract.

Abbreviations: GDD, growing degree day • HO, high oil • HOC, high-oil corn • NWBRF, Northwest Branch Research Farm • WBRF, Western Branch Research Farm




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. F. Mangen, P. R. Thomison, and S. D. Strachan
Early-Season Defoliation Effects on TopCross High-Oil Corn Production
Agron. J., April 27, 2005; 97(3): 823 - 831.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. R. Thomison, A. B. Geyer, L. D. Lotz, H. J. Siegrist, and T. L. Dobbels
TopCross High Oil Corn Production: Select Grain Quality Attributes
Agron. J., January 1, 2003; 95(1): 147 - 154.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2002 by the American Society of Agronomy.