HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (2) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Williams, M. J. Articles by Hammond, A. C. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Williams, M. J. Articles by Hammond, A. C. Agricola Articles by Williams, M. J. Articles by Hammond, A. C. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops Production Agriculture

PRODUCTION PAPERS

Diet Quality and Performance of Heifers in the Subtropics

^a USDA-ARS, Subtropical Agric. Res. Stn., 22271 Chinsegut Hill Rd., Brooksville, FL 34601-4672
^b Usda-Ars, Saa, Athens, Ga 30604

* Corresponding author (mjwi{at}mail.ifas.ufl.edu)

Received for publication May 30, 2000. The effects of continuous vs. rotational stocking of bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum Flugge), previous winter nutritional regimen {corn (Zea mays L.) + soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] meal (CS) vs. soybean meal (SBM)}, and breed [Angus, Hereford, and Senepol (Bos taurus) and Brahman (B. indicus)] were determined in 1990 to 1992. Forage mass [kg ha^-1 dry matter (DM)], forage nutritive value [crude protein (CP) and in vitro organic matter digestibility (IVOMD)], average daily gain (ADG), body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), and plasma urea N (PUN) and glucose (PGLU) were measured. There was a consistent carryover effect (P < 0.05) of winter supplementation for initial BW and BCS, with CS > SBM while for PUN, SBM > CS. Breed affected most animal variables, with the general ranking of Angus Hereford Brahman and Senepol. Forage mass varied from an average of 1000 kg ha^-1 in 1990 to 2000 kg ha^-1 in 1992 because of rainfall distribution. Grazing treatment did not affect forage DM, CP, or IVOMD, but heifers that were continuously grazed had higher (P = 0.0001) PUN levels than heifers that were rotationally grazed. Only during 1990, when dry weather restricted forage growth, did this translate into a trend for improved ADG and final BW. Because grazing management did not affect heifer performance in most years, the effects noted in this study resulted from: (i) the change in forage nutritive value during the grazing season; (ii) the carryover effect of previous winter supplementation; and (iii) breed differences, particularly temperate vs. tropical breeds.

Abbreviations: ADG, average daily gain • BCS, body condition score • BW, body weight • CP, crude protein • CS, corn + soybean meal • DM, dry matter • IVOMD, in vitro organic matter digestibility • PGLU, plasma urea glucose • PUN, plasma urea nitrogen • SBM, soybean meal

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. P. Coffey, W. K. Coblentz, D. A. Scarbrough, J. B. Humphry, B. C. McGinley, J. E. Turner, T. F. Smith, D. S. Hubbell III, Z. B. Johnson, D. H. Hellwig, et al. Effect of rotation frequency and weaning date on forage measurements and growth performance by cows and calves grazing endophyte-infected tall fescue pastures overseeded with crabgrass and legumes J Anim Sci, November 1, 2005; 83(11): 2684 - 2695. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]