HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Parsch, L. D. Articles by Crabtree, N. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Parsch, L. D. Articles by Crabtree, N. S. Agricola Articles by Parsch, L. D. Articles by Crabtree, N. S. Related Collections Economics Crop Rotation Systems Production Agriculture Tillage

PRODUCTION PAPER

Economic Analysis of Conservation and Conventional Tillage Cropping Systems on Clayey Soil in Eastern Arkansas

^a Dep. of Crops, Soil, and Environ. Sci., 115 Plant Sci. Bldg., Univ. of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701
^b Dep. of Crops, Soil, and Environ. Sci., Univ. of Arkansas, Northeast Res. and Ext. Cent., P.O. Box 48, Keiser, AR 72351

* Corresponding author (lparsch{at}uark.edu)

Conservation tillage offers an alternative approach for managing clayey soils in the midsouthern United States. This study compared conservation tillage seedbed preparation vs. conventional tillage main plots with subplots of (i) nonirrigated soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.), (ii) irrigated soybean, (iii) irrigated grain sorghum (Sorghum vulgare L.), (iv) irrigated soybean followed by irrigated grain sorghum, (v) irrigated soybean followed by irrigated corn (Zea mays L.), and (vi) continuous irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for the years 1986 to 1991 at Keiser, AR. Cropping practices were similar to those used by producers in the area. Grain sorghum yielded better in a soybean rotation than in monoculture and also in conventionally tilled seedbed than in conservation tillage. For other crops, yield did not differ significantly by tillage. Except for cotton, conventional tillage resulted in higher average net returns (NR) than conservation tillage. Although the most profitable system was continuous cotton with conservation tillage, NR varied widely across years, and there were fewer observations for cotton than for other systems in the study. Among conventional tillage seedbed preparation, nonirrigated continuous soybean was more profitable than any of the irrigated systems, including irrigated soybean. However, irrigated soybean resulted in NR that were less variable than nonirrigated soybean. The study confirmed the increased variable costs and decreased equipment costs that accompany conservation tillage systems. Even with the dramatic changes in burndown herbicide costs that have occurred since the study was conducted, the rankings of the cropping systems for profitability would not change.

Abbreviations: ACES, Arkansas Cooperative Extension Service • MSBG, Mississippi State Budget Generator • NR, net returns • TC, total costs • TFC, total fixed costs • TVC, total variable costs

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. L. Nail, D. L. Young, and W. F. Schillinger Government Subsidies and Crop Insurance Effects on the Economics of Conservation Cropping Systems in Eastern Washington Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 614 - 620. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. L. Pendell, J. R. Williams, C. W. Rice, R. G. Nelson, and S. B. Boyles Economic feasibility of no-tillage and manure for soil carbon sequestration in corn production in northeastern kansas. J. Environ. Qual., July 1, 2006; 35(4): 1364 - 1373. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]