HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lu, H.-Y. Articles by Wei, M.-L. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Lu, H.-Y. Articles by Wei, M.-L. Agricola Articles by Lu, H.-Y. Articles by Wei, M.-L. Related Collections Other Crops

TROPICAL SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Seasonal Variation in Linear Increase of Taro Harvest Index Explained by Growing Degree Days

^a Dep. of Agron., Taiwan Agric. Res. Inst. (TARI), 189 Chung-Cheng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung Hsien, Taiwan 41301, Republic of China
^b Office of Farm Manage., Taiwan Agric. Res. Inst. (TARI), 189 Chung-Cheng Rd., Wufeng, Taichung Hsien, Taiwan 41301, Republic of China

* Corresponding author (iying{at}wufeng.tari.gov.tw)

Received for publication January 4, 2001. Selecting plants with high harvest index (HI) can increase corm yield in wetland taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]. Planting time, however, affects the response of HI during the linear increase phase, with temperature being the most important factor affecting taro growth. The objectives of this research were to quantify the relationship of calendar days after planting (DAP) and growing degree days after planting (GDD) to HI in taro and to compare their ability to explain seasonal variation in the linear increase of HI. Data from six planting months of field-grown taro across a 3-yr period were collated to investigate the linear increase in HI. The DAP and GDD (with base temperature of 17°C) were included as independent variables to analyze the three-phase piecewise linear function with HI. Piecewise linear functions based on either DAP or GDD fitted well. The responses during the linear increase phase of HI were, however, more stable across years for the GDD model. Moreover, the model based on GDD was superior to DAP for explaining the seasonal variation of HI in taro. These results indicate that the GDD model is a useful approach for determining weather–crop growth relations in taro. Information gained in this study should help relate phenological responses to seasonal variation in taro.

Abbreviations: DAP, calendar days after planting • GDD, growing degree days after planting • HI, harvest index

This article has been cited by other articles:

				K. Girma, S. L. Holtz, D. B. Arnall, L. M. Fultz, T. L. Hanks, K. D. Lawles, C. J. Mack, K. W. Owen, S. D. Reed, J. Santillano, et al. Weather, Fertilizer, Previous Year Yield, and Fertilizer Levels Affect Ensuing Year Fertilizer Response of Wheat Agron. J., November 6, 2007; 99(6): 1607 - 1614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H.-Y. Lu, C.-T. Lu, M.-L. Wei, and L.-F. Chan Comparison of Different Models for Nondestructive Leaf Area Estimation in Taro Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 448 - 453. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]