Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Darmosarkoro, W.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Darmosarkoro, W.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I. C.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Darmosarkoro, W.
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, I. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Agronomy Journal 93:1028-1034 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy

FORAGES

Growth, Development, and Yield of Soybean Lines Developed for Forage

Witjaksana Darmosarkoroa, Matthew M. Harbura, Dwayne R. Buxtonb, Kenneth J. Moore*,a, Thomas E. Devineb and Irvin C. Andersona

a Dep. of Agronomy, 2101 Agronomy Hall, Iowa State Univ., Ames, IA 50011
b USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD

* Corresponding author (kjmoore{at}iastate.edu)

Received for publication August 25, 2000. Recently, soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] cultivars have been developed specifically for use as a forage crop. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of maturity group on and compare the agronomic performance of forage and grain soybean cultivars in Iowa. In 1994, 13 forage- and five grain-type cultivars were studied. In 1995, one additional forage cultivar and grain cultivar were each evaluated. Node number, plant height, lodging, and dry matter accumulation were measured biweekly during the growing season. By 135 days after planting (DAP), forage cultivars yielded 5 to 19% more dry matter than ‘Sherman’, which had the greatest yield among grain cultivars. Forage cultivars were 37 to 69% taller than ‘Biloxi’, the tallest grain cultivar, which may partially explain the greater lodging of the forage cultivars compared with the grain cultivars. Forage cultivars initiated reproductive growth 60 to 88 DAP, whereas the locally adapted Sherman cultivar initiated reproductive growth 55 DAP. Forage cultivars produced more dry matter than grain cultivars, but had a lower leaf/stem ratio and leaf + pod/stem ratio in August and September, respectively, which may reduce forage quality. Forage cultivars developed in Pennsylvania generally accumulated more dry matter than forage cultivars developed in Virginia by late August, but initiated reproductive growth sooner and produced less dry matter by late September. The significant productivity differences observed between forage and grain cultivars suggest the potential of breeding to improve the forage potential of soybean.

Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J DAIRY SCIHome page
E. Vargas-Bello-Perez, A. F. Mustafa, and P. Seguin
Effects of Feeding Forage Soybean Silage on Milk Production, Nutrient Digestion, and Ruminal Fermentation of Lactating Dairy Cows
J Dairy Sci, January 1, 2008; 91(1): 229 - 235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.