Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J. D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, L.
Right arrow Articles by Hesketh, J. D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soybean
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Plant and Environment Interactions
Right arrow Crop Ecology
Agronomy Journal 93:944-948 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy

SOYBEAN

Effects of Photoperiod on Growth and Development of Soybean Floral Bud in Different Maturity

Lingxiao Zhang*,a, Ruifang Wangb and John D. Heskethc

a Delta Res. and Ext. Cent., Mississippi State Univ., P.O. Box 197, Stoneville, MS 38776
b Dep. of Agron., Beijing Agric. Univ., Beijing, China
c Dep. of Crop Sci., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801 and USDA-ARS, 1201 W. Goodwin Ave., Urbana, IL 61801

* Corresponding author (lzhang{at}drec.msstate.edu)

Received for publication August 8, 2000. Growth and development of most soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] plants is sensitive to photoperiod effects. Therefore, it is important to understand and quantify the processes involved. Studies were conducted to determine growing degree days required for growth of the floral bud from initiation to open flower of different maturity groups (MGs) in both field and controlled environments. Eighteen soybean strains, including ‘Clark’ back-cross near-isolines differing in maturity, were sown in the field at five different dates in 1992 and 1993. In growth chamber studies, plants of two strains differing in maturity were used and moved to 12-, 14-, and 16-h daylengths after floral buds were initiated in 12 h. Results from both field and growth chamber studies indicated that planting dates had a significant effect on the thermal requirement for bud growth in the late-maturing strains used. Shorter photoperiods during the bud growth period accelerated growth rates to open flower. Furthermore, in the growth chamber study, flowering was inhibited under 16-h daylength in a late-maturity (MG V) strain when plants were transferred immediately after floral bud initiation (FBI) under 12 h. Plants remaining 8 d after FBI before they were transferred to 16 h were not significantly delayed in flowering. This study indicated that photoperiod length and treatment duration affects soybean FBI and floral bud development in a quantitative way, which resulted in a profound photoperiod response in late maturity-group soybean under field conditions.

Abbreviations: FBD, floral bud development • FBI, floral bud initiation • GDD, growing degree days • MG, maturity group




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
B. S. Sharratt and R. W. Gesch
Emergence of Polymer-Coated Corn and Soybean Influenced by Tillage and Sowing Date
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 585 - 590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.