Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Muir, J. P.
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Agronomy Journal 93:896-901 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy

FORAGES

Biomass Production of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass in Response to Nitrogen, Phosphorus, and Row Spacing

James P. Muir*,a, Matt A. Sandersonb, William R. Ocumpaughc, Ronald M. Jonesa and Roderick L. Reedd

a Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. and Ext. Cent., Route 2, Box 00, Stephenville, TX 76401
b USDA-ARS, Pasture Syst. and Watershed Manage. Res. Unit, Bldg. 3702, Curtin Rd., University Park, PA 16802-3702
c Texas A&M Univ. Agric. Res. Stn., Beeville, TX
d San Angelo State Univ., San Angelo, TX

* Corresponding author (j-muir{at}tamu.edu)

Received for publication July 21, 2000. Management practices for biomass production of bioenergy grasses may differ from management for forage. Our objective was to determine the yield and stand responses of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) to N and P fertilization as affected by row spacing. A combination of five rates each of N and P were applied to plots during 1992 to 1998 at Stephenville, TX and 1993 to 1995 at Beeville, TX. Three row-spacing treatments were applied as subplots. Biomass production was determined each year with a single harvest in late summer. Tiller density and tiller mass were measured during 1993 to 1996 at Stephenville. Biomass production was not influenced by the addition of P. Biomass production response to N at Beeville was greater in narrow rows than wide rows during the establishment year only. Biomass production responses to N were quadratic in 5 of 7 yr at Stephenville and linear at Beeville. A maximum yield of 22.5 Mg ha-1 occurred during 1995 at Stephenville at 168 kg N ha-1. Lodging occurred at both locations but only at the 224 kg N ha-1 rate. Tiller density and mass increased as row width increased. Tiller mass also increased with increasing N fertility at Stephenville. This response was more important in determining biomass production than was tiller density. Average biomass production at 168 kg N ha-1 yr-1 was 14.5 and 10.7 Mg ha-1 yr-1 at Stephenville and Beeville, respectively. Biomass production without applied N tended to decline over the years. Our data indicated that switchgrass biomass production is sustainable at Stephenville only with the application of at least 168 kg N ha-1 yr-1, but P application and row spacing are not crucial.

Abbreviations: NUE, N use efficiency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. R. Bow, J. P. Muir, D. C. Weindorf, R. E. Rosiere, and T. J. Butler
Integration of Cool-Season Annual Legumes and Dairy Manure Compost with Switchgrass
Crop Sci., July 1, 2008; 48(4): 1621 - 1628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Environ. Qual.Home page
T. W. Simpson, A. N. Sharpley, R. W. Howarth, H. W. Paerl, and K. R. Mankin
The New Gold Rush: Fueling Ethanol Production while Protecting Water Quality
J. Environ. Qual., March 1, 2008; 37(2): 318 - 324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. K. Lee, V. N. Owens, and J. J. Doolittle
Switchgrass and Soil Carbon Sequestration Response to Ammonium Nitrate, Manure, and Harvest Frequency on Conservation Reserve Program Land
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 462 - 468.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. R. Adler, M. A. Sanderson, A. A. Boateng, P. J. Weimer, and H.-J. G. Jung
Biomass Yield and Biofuel Quality of Switchgrass Harvested in Fall or Spring
Agron. J., October 3, 2006; 98(6): 1518 - 1525.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
D. K. Lee and A. Boe
Biomass Production of Switchgrass in Central South Dakota
Crop Sci., October 27, 2005; 45(6): 2583 - 2590.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
K. A. Cassida, J. P. Muir, M. A. Hussey, J. C. Read, B. C. Venuto, and W. R. Ocumpaugh
Biomass Yield and Stand Characteristics of Switchgrass in South Central U.S. Environments
Crop Sci., February 23, 2005; 45(2): 673 - 681.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. R. McLaughlin, T. E. Fairbrother, and D. E. Rowe
Nutrient Uptake by Warm-Season Perennial Grasses in a Swine Effluent Spray Field
Agron. J., March 1, 2004; 96(2): 484 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
K. P. Vogel, J. J. Brejda, D. T. Walters, and D. R. Buxton
Switchgrass Biomass Production in the Midwest USA: Harvest and Nitrogen Management
Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 413 - 420.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.