HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cavero, J. Articles by Faci, J. M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Cavero, J. Articles by Faci, J. M. Agricola Articles by Cavero, J. Articles by Faci, J. M. Related Collections Maize Crop Models Spatial Distribution Irrigation

AGROCLIMATOLOGY

Simulation of Maize Grain Yield Variability within a Surface-Irrigated Field

^a Dep. Genética y Producción Vegetal, Estación Experimental de Aula Dei (CSIC), Apdo. 202, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain
^b Unidad de Suelos y Riegos, Servicio de Investigación Agroalimentaria (DGA), Apdo. 727, 50080 Zaragoza, Spain

* Corresponding author (jcavero{at}eead.csic.es)

Received for publication December 17, 1999. Spatial variability of crop yield within a surface-irrigated field is related to spatial variability of available water due to nonuniform irrigation and soil characteristics, among other factors (e.g., soil fertility). The infiltrated depth at each location within the field can be estimated by measurements of opportunity time and infiltration rate or simulated with irrigation models. We investigated the use of the crop growth model EPICphase to simulate the spatial variability of maize (Zea mays L.) grain yield within a level basin using estimated or simulated (with the irrigation model B2D) infiltrated depth. The relevance of the spatial variability of infiltration rate, opportunity time, and soil surface elevation in the simulation of grain yield spatial variability was also investigated. The measured maize grain yields at 73 locations within the level basin, ranging from 3.16 to 11.54 t ha^-1 (SD = 1.79 t ha^-1), were used for comparison. Estimated infiltrated depth considering uniform infiltration rate resulted in poor simulation of the spatial variability of grain yield [SD = 0.59 t ha^-1, root mean square error (RMSE) = 1.98 t ha^-1]. Simulated infiltrated depth with the irrigation model considering uniform infiltration rate and soil surface elevation resulted in grain yield simulations with lower variability than measured (SD = 0.64 t ha^-1, RMSE = 1.58 t ha^-1). Introducing both sources of spatial variability in the irrigation model resulted in the best simulation of grain yield spatial variability (SD = 1.68 t ha^-1, RMSE = 1.16 t ha^-1; regression of calculated vs. measured yields: slope = 0.74, r² = 0.56).

Abbreviations: DU, distribution uniformity • ET, evapotranspiration • FC, field capacity • LAI, leaf area index • PET, potential evapotranspiration • RMSE, root mean square error • WP, wilting point

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. Lokupitiya, F. J. Breidt, R. Lokupitiya, S. Williams, and K. Paustian Deriving Comprehensive County-Level Crop Yield and Area Data for U.S. Cropland Agron. J., April 4, 2007; 99(3): 673 - 681. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. N. Kravchenko, K. D. Thelen, D. G. Bullock, and N. R. Miller Relationship among Crop Grain Yield, Topography, and Soil Electrical Conductivity Studied with Cross-Correlograms Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1132 - 1139. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]