HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Rotz, C.A. Articles by Schnabel, R. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Rotz, C.A. Articles by Schnabel, R. R. Agricola Articles by Rotz, C.A. Articles by Schnabel, R. R. Related Collections Soybean Economics Crop Models Production Agriculture

PRODUCTION PAPER

Economic and Environmental Implications of Soybean Production and Use on Pennsylvania Dairy Farms

^a USDA-ARS, Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Res. Unit, Building 3702, Curtin Road, University Park, PA 16802
^b Dep. of Agron, Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802

Corresponding author (alrotz{at}psu.edu)

Soybean (Glycine max L.) production is rapidly increasing on Pennsylvania dairy farms. A whole-farm analysis was conducted to determine the potential long-term economic benefit to producers and the environmental impact of growing and feeding soybean as a protein feed supplement. Representative dairy farms were simulated with various production strategies for 25 yr of Pennsylvania weather using the Dairy Forage System Model (DAFOSYM). Production of soybean as a cash crop increased annual farm net return by up to $55 cow^-1 when ample cropland was available to produce most of the feed requirement of the herd. With a more restricted land base, there was less economic benefit to shifting land from corn (Zea mays L.) or alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) production to soybean. When the soybean was fed in a raw or roasted form, most of this economic benefit was offset, giving an increase in annual net return of <$15 cow^-1. There was also little environmental benefit (reduced N loss or soil P accumulation) in growing soybean as a cash crop or feed on dairy farms. In general, the current trend toward producing and feeding soybean on Pennsylvania dairy farms does not appear to provide substantial long-term economic benefit to the producer, nor does it appear to reduce the potential impact of the farm on its environment. However, under specific farming practices such as inefficient feeding of protein supplements or the production and feeding of high corn silage rations, an economic benefit of up to $100 cow^-1 can be obtained through soybean production and feeding.

Abbreviations: CERES, Crop Estimation through Resource and Environment Synthesis • DAFOSYM, Dairy Forage System Model • DM, dry matter • DSSAT, Decision Support System for Agricultural Technology • NDF, neutral-detergent fiber • NLEAP, Nitrate Leaching and Economic Analysis Package

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. A. Rotz, G. H. Kamphuis, H. D. Karsten, and R. D. Weaver Organic Dairy Production Systems in Pennsylvania: A Case Study Evaluation J Dairy Sci, August 1, 2007; 90(8): 3961 - 3979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. M. Sulc and B. F. Tracy Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 335 - 345. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Rotz Management to reduce nitrogen losses in animal production J Anim Sci, January 1, 2004; 82(13_suppl): E119 - 137. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. A. Rotz, A. N. Sharpley, L. D. Satter, W. J. Gburek, and M. A. Sanderson Production and Feeding Strategies for Phosphorus Management on Dairy Farms J Dairy Sci, November 1, 2002; 85(11): 3142 - 3153. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]