Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Payne, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Payne, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Payne, W. A.
Right arrow Articles by Ramig, R. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Wheat
Right arrow Other Crops
Right arrow Crop Models
Right arrow Tillage
Agronomy Journal 93:250-260 (2001)
© 2001 American Society of Agronomy

MODELING

Assessing Simple Wheat and Pea Models Using Data from a Long-Term Tillage Experiment

William A. Payne, Paul E. Rasmussen, Chengci Chen and Robert E. Ramig

Oregon State Univ., Columbia Basin Agric. Res. Cent., P.O. Box 370, Pendleton, OR 97801

Corresponding author (w-payne{at}tamu.edu)

Fresh green pea (Pisum sativum L.) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) are grown in rotation with intensive tillage in northeast Oregon. We evaluated simple yield models for both crops using data from a long-term experiment that included four tillage treatments and soil water content measurements. Yields were affected by tillage for some of the 21 yr of study, but there was no consistent ranking among tillage treatments from year to year and no effect when data were pooled. Standardizing pea yields to a tenderometer reading of 100 failed to improve detection of treatment effect. Tillage affected wheat water use (ET) for three of the study years and water use efficiency (WUEET) for one. Conservation tillage reduced pea ET for seven of the study years. For combined years, however, there was no tillage effect on yield, ET, or WUEET of either crop. Wheat yield was better predicted from ET than by the Leggett model, which uses March soil water storage and spring rain . Yield prediction was improved when ET was divided by seasonal mean daily water vapor pressure deficit () . Multiple-regression equations using monthly rain predicted wheat yield well , but coefficients differed among data sets. A model using monthly rain and heat degree day sum (HDDS) predicted pea yield much better than ET-based equations , suggesting that pea yield is limited by factors other than water. For wheat, ET/-based models should replace the Leggett model. However, for pea, multiple regression models predict yield better than ET-based models.

Abbreviations: ANOVA, analysis of variance • DOY, day of the year • ET, crop water use (transpiration + evaporation of water from the soil surface) • Fall R-CH, fall roto-till wheat residue and chisel plow pea residue • Fall MBD-MBD, fall moldboard plow wheat residue and moldboard plow pea residue • Fall SWP-SKW, fall sweep wheat residue and skew-tread pea residue • HDDS, heat degree day sum • Spring MBD-MBD, spring moldboard plow wheat residue and moldboard plow pea residue • , mean daily water vapor pressure deficit for the growing season • WUEET, water use efficiency (crop yield/ET)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. J. MacKenzie and C. K. Chandler
A Method to Predict Weekly Strawberry Fruit Yields from Extended Season Production Systems
Agron. J., March 4, 2009; 101(2): 278 - 287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
S. Machado, S. Petrie, K. Rhinhart, and R. E. Ramig
Tillage Effects on Water Use and Grain Yield of Winter Wheat and Green Pea in Rotation
Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 154 - 162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. Chen, P. Miller, F. Muehlbauer, K. Neill, D. Wichman, and K. McPhee
Winter Pea and Lentil Response to Seeding Date and Micro- and Macro-Environments
Agron. J., October 31, 2006; 98(6): 1655 - 1663.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. A. Payne, C. Chen, and D. A. Ball
Agronomic Potential of Narrow-Leafed and White Lupins in the Inland Pacific Northwest
Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1501 - 1508.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. Chen, W. A. Payne, R. W. Smiley, and M. A. Stoltz
Yield and Water-Use Efficiency of Eight Wheat Cultivars Planted on Seven Dates in Northeastern Oregon
Agron. J., July 1, 2003; 95(4): 836 - 843.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
C. Chen and W. A. Payne
Measured and Modeled Unsaturated Hydraulic Conductivity of a Walla Walla Silt Loam
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2001; 65(5): 1385 - 1391.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2001 by the American Society of Agronomy.