|
|
||||||||
a USDA-ARS Application and Production Technical Res. Unit, Stoneville, MS 38776
b Dep. of Agric. Economics, Mississippi State Univ., Mississippi State, MS 39762
Corresponding author (rwesley{at}ars.usda.gov)
Deep tillage (subsoiling) of clayey soils in the fall when the profile is dry is a new concept that results in increased yields and net returns from soybean [Glycine max (L). Merr.] grown without irrigation. Crop rotation may also result in increased crop yields. Field studies were conducted on Tunica clay (clayey over loamy, smectitic, nonacid, thermic, Vertic Haplaquept) near Stoneville, MS (33°26' N lat) to determine the individual and combined effects of fall deep tillage and crop rotations on crop yields and net returns. Treatments included monocrop cotton [Gossypium hirsutum (L.)], soybean, and grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench], and biennial rotations of cotton with grain sorghum and soybean with grain sorghum grown without irrigation and in either a conventional-till (CT) or deep-till (DT) production system. Yields from all cotton and soybean crop sequences grown in the DT respectively averaged 541 kg ha-1 and 525 kg ha-1 greater than comparable cotton (2184 kg ha-1) and soybean (2983 kg ha-1) crop sequences grown in the CT. Net returns from monocrop cotton ($552 ha-1) and soybean ($462 ha-1) in the DT respectively averaged $392 ha-1 and $121 ha-1 more than similar crop sequences in the CT. Rotations increased cotton and soybean yields but not net returns because of the low value of the grain sorghum component. These data indicate that fall deep tillage should be incorporated into monocrop cotton and soybean crop sequences to maximize and stabilize net returns from these crops on Tunica clay.
Abbreviations: CT, conventional-till production system CV, coefficient of variation DT, deep-till production system
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Adeli, H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, and D. E. Rowe Broiler Litter Fertilization and Cropping System Impacts on Soil Properties Agron. J., November 1, 2009; 101(6): 1304 - 1310. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Tewolde, N. Buehring, A. Adeli, K. R. Sistani, D. E. Rowe, and R. G. Pratt Cotton Response to Chicken Litter in Rotation with Corn in Clayey Soil Agron. J., May 8, 2009; 101(3): 626 - 634. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. J. Boquet, B. S. Tubana, H. J. Mascagni Jr., M. Holman, and S. Hague Cotton Yield Responses to Fertilizer Nitrogen Rates in a Cotton-Corn Rotation Agron. J., March 4, 2009; 101(2): 400 - 407. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||