HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Colla, G. Articles by Poudel, D. D. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Colla, G. Articles by Poudel, D. D. Agricola Articles by Colla, G. Articles by Poudel, D. D. Related Collections Crop Rotation Systems Other Crops Soil Analysis Other Soil Management

SOIL MANAGEMENT

Soil Physical Properties and Tomato Yield and Quality in Alternative Cropping Systems

^a Dep. of Crop Production, Univ. of Tuscia, VT 01100, Tuscia, Italy
^b Dep. of Agronomy and Range Sci., Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616 USA

mitchell{at}uckac.edu

The Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems (SAFS) Project has studied the transition to low-input and organic alternatives in California's Sacramento Valley. This project compares a 4-yr rotation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.), corn (Zea mays L.), and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) followed by double-cropped bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in the conventional system and oat (Avena sativa L.)–purple vetch (Vicia benghalensis L.) in the low-input and organic systems. A conventional 2-yr rotation (tomato–wheat) is also studied. In 1997 and 1998, we evaluated the transition to alternative systems on soil bulk density, water holding capacity, infiltration and storage, water use efficiency, and `Brigade' tomato yield and quality. No differences in laboratory determinations of soil bulk density and water holding capacity were found; however, in situ water holding capacity was highest in the organic system, lowest in the conventional 4-yr rotation and intermediate in the low-input and conventional 2-yr rotations. In 1998, infiltration during 3-h irrigations was 0.028 m³ m^-1 for the conventional, and 0.062 m³ m^-1 and 0.065 m³ m^-1 for the low-input and organic systems, respectively. Similar results were observed in 1997. The alternative systems required more water per irrigation for uniform application, resulting in higher soil water content in the organic systems throughout 1998. Evapotranspiration was higher in the conventional systems in both years relative to other systems. Tomato yields did not differ among systems in either year. Fruit quality was highest in the conventional 4-yr system.

Abbreviations: CCOF, California Certified Organic Farmers • CONV2, conventionally managed 2-yr rotation • CONV4, conventionally managed 4-yr rotation • E, evaporation • ET, evapotranspiration • LOW, low-input 4-yr rotation • ORG, organically managed 4-yr rotation • SAFS, Sustainable Agriculture Farming Systems • WUE, water use efficiency