Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kustas, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Kustas, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Kustas, W. P.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, J. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Watershed and Landscape Processes
Right arrow Other Models
Agronomy Journal 92:847-854 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

SPARSE CANOPY SYMPOSIUM INTRODUCTION

A Two-Source Energy Balance Approach Using Directional Radiometric Temperature Observations for Sparse Canopy Covered Surfaces

William P. Kustas and John M. Norman

Dep. of Soil Science, Univ. of Wisconsin, 1525 Observatory Dr., Madison, WI 53706 USA

bkustas{at}hydrolab.arsusda.gov

A two-source energy balance model developed to use directional radiometric surface temperature for estimating component heat fluxes from soil and vegetation has had several recent modifications to account for some of the unique properties associated with sparse canopies. Two of these changes involve the algorithms predicting the divergence of net radiation inside the canopy and how to account for clumped vegetation, which affects both the wind and radiation penetration inside the canopy and radiative temperature partitioning between soil and vegetation components. Model results with and without these modifications are compared using data collected from a sparsely vegetated row crop of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. cv. Delta Pine 77). It is suggested that these two new algorithms be incorporated in any two-source model applied to sparse canopies.

Abbreviations: LAI, leaf area index • RMSD, root-mean-square-difference • MB, mean-bias




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. C. Anderson, W. P. Kustas, and J. M. Norman
Upscaling Flux Observations from Local to Continental Scales Using Thermal Remote Sensing
Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 240 - 254.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. C. Anderson, W. P. Kustas, and J. M. Norman
Upscaling and Downscaling--A Regional View of the Soil-Plant-Atmosphere Continuum
Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1408 - 1423.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. A. Payne
Optimizing Crop Water Use in Sparse Stands of Pearl Millet
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.