Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pilbeam, C. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pilbeam, C. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Gregory, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Pilbeam, C. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Water Use
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Other Models
Right arrow Other Soil Types
Agronomy Journal 92:814-820 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

SPARSE CANOPY SYMPOSIUM INTRODUCTION

Soil Type, Climatic Regime, and the Response of Water Use Efficiency to Crop Management

Peter J. Gregory, Lester P. Simmonds and Colin J. Pilbeam

Dep. of Soil Science, The Univ. of Reading, P.O. Box 233, Whiteknights, Reading, RG6 6DW, UK

p.j.gregory{at}reading.ac.uk

In many rainfed regions of the world, only a small fraction of the total water available for crop production is transpired and water use efficiency (WUE) is low. Changes in crop management practice to reduce evaporation from the soil surface (Es) have been successful in some locations but unsuccessful elsewhere. This paper outlines a conceptual framework for assessing the potential for improved crop management to reduce Es and summarizes results from Syria, Kenya, and Niger. The results show that factors such as evaporative demand, amount and frequency of rainfall, soil texture, and the distribution of roots interact to influence the sensitivity of Es to management practices that modify canopy area and root growth. Using a simulation model we demonstrate the quantitative effect of these interactions and show that the scope for reducing Es is greatest in clay soils in locations with frequent rain and low evaporative demand and least on sandy soils in regions with sporadic rainfall and high evaporative demand. The distribution of roots has a marked influence on the rate of drying of the soil surface and thereby on soil hydraulic conductivity which becomes more important as evaporative demand increases relative to rainfall.

Abbreviations: WUE, water use efficiency




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
S. S. Andrews, D. L. Karlen, and C. A. Cambardella
The Soil Management Assessment Framework: A Quantitative Soil Quality Evaluation Method
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 1945 - 1962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
W. A. Payne
Optimizing Crop Water Use in Sparse Stands of Pearl Millet
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 808 - 814.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.