Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Le Coultre, I. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Le Coultre, I. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Turner, N. C.
Right arrow Articles by Le Coultre, I. F.
Agronomy Journal 92:538-541 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

NOTES & UNIQUE PHENOMENA

Leaf-Cutter Psychrometers

A Cautionary Note

Neil C. Turnera, Kenneth A. Shackelb and Ian F. Le Coultrea

a CSIRO Plant Industry, Private Bag No. 5, Wembley (Perth), W.A. 6913, Australia
b Dep. of Pomology, Univ. of California, Davis, CA 95616-8683 USA

n.turner{at}ccmar.csiro.au

Nontranspiring (covered) leaf water potential on greenhouse-grown chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) leaves was measured with the pressure chamber and leaf-cutter psychrometer techniques over a range of water potentials. Potentials measured with the leaf-cutter psychrometer technique were highly variable and not well correlated with the values measured with the pressure chamber. The objectives of this study were to identify the basis for the discrepancy between the two techniques and to identify procedures to minimize the errors. Intentionally damaging 15% of the disc caused an increase (less negative) in the potentials measured in the psychrometers relative to those measured in the pressure chamber. When leaves were sampled with a sharp razor or a new biopsy punch, however, potential values similar to those measured by the pressure chamber were obtained. We conclude that unintentional damage caused by the psychrometer's cutter can give erroneous values of leaf water potential measured by leaf-cutter psychrometry.

Abbreviations: {Delta}V/V, relative cell volume • {epsilon}, volumetric elastic modulus • {psi}, water potential(s) • {psi}p, turgor pressure • {psi}s, osmotic potential







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.