Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Maize
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Right arrow Tillage
Agronomy Journal 92:493-500 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Tillage x Rotation x Management Interactions in Corn

Tawainga W. Katsvairo and William J. Cox

Dep. of Soil, Crop, and Atmospheric Sci., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA

wjc3{at}cornell.edu

Although corn (Zea mays L.) yields following soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] or wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) exceed yields of continuous corn, continuous corn is common in the northeastern USA because of demand for corn by the dairy industry. We evaluated corn under different tillage (moldboard plow, chisel, and ridge), rotation (continuous corn, soybean–corn, soybean–corn–corn, and soybean–wheat/red clover (Trifolium pratense L.)–corn), and management systems (high and low chemical input) for 6 yr to determine optimum cropping systems for corn. In moldboard plow, corn in soybean–wheat/red clover–corn (9.2 Mg ha-1) and soybean–corn (8.5 Mg ha-1) rotations under low chemical yielded greater than continuous corn under high chemical management (7.9 Mg ha-1). In chisel tillage, corn in the soybean–corn rotation yielded greater under high chemical (8.9 Mg ha-1) and similarly under low chemical (7.9 Mg ha-1) compared with continuous corn under high chemical management (7.6 Mg ha-1). In ridge tillage, corn in soybean–corn or first-year corn in soybean–corn–corn rotations yielded greater under high chemical (8.1 Mg ha-1) but less under low chemical (6.3 and 6.8 Mg ha-1, respectively) compared with continuous corn under high chemical management (7.5 Mg ha-1). Growers under similar environmental conditions to this study can increase corn yields while reducing inputs by adopting soybean–wheat/red clover–corn and soybean–corn rotations in moldboard plow or a soybean–corn rotation in chisel tillage. In ridge tillage, growers could adopt soybean–corn or soybean–corn–corn rotations, which would increase corn yields but not reduce inputs when compared with continuous corn.

Abbreviations: GDD, growing degree days • Vn, nth leaf stage




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. L. Jordan, J. S. Barnes, T. Corbett, C. R. Bogle, P. D. Johnson, B. B. Shew, S. R. Koenning, W. Ye, and R. L. Brandenburg
Crop Response to Rotation and Tillage in Peanut-Based Cropping Systems
Agron. J., October 21, 2008; 100(6): 1580 - 1586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. A. Cavigelli, J. R. Teasdale, and A. E. Conklin
Long-Term Agronomic Performance of Organic and Conventional Field Crops in the Mid-Atlantic Region
Agron. J., May 7, 2008; 100(3): 785 - 794.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. G. Kravchenko and K. D. Thelen
Effect of Winter Wheat Crop Residue on No-Till Corn Growth and Development
Agron. J., March 12, 2007; 99(2): 549 - 555.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. M. Sulc and B. F. Tracy
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 335 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Meyer-Aurich, K. Janovicek, W. Deen, and A. Weersink
Impact of Tillage and Rotation on Yield and Economic Performance in Corn-Based Cropping Systems
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1204 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. M. Cherr, J. M. S. Scholberg, and R. McSorley
Green Manure Approaches to Crop Production: A Synthesis
Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 302 - 319.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Pikul Jr., L. Hammack, and W. E. Riedell
Corn Yield, Nitrogen Use, and Corn Rootworm Infestation of Rotations in the Northern Corn Belt
Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 854 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. Katsvairo, W. J. Cox, and H. van Es
Tillage and Rotation Effects on Soil Physical Characteristics
Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 299 - 304.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo and W. J. Cox
Economics of Cropping Systems Featuring Different Rotations, Tillage, and Management
Agron. J., May 1, 2000; 92(3): 485 - 493.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.