Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Katsvairo, T. W.
Right arrow Articles by Cox, W. J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Other Crop Management
Right arrow Other Cropping Systems
Right arrow Other Soil Management
Right arrow Tillage
Agronomy Journal 92:485-493 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Economics of Cropping Systems Featuring Different Rotations, Tillage, and Management

Tawainga W. Katsvairo and William J. Cox

Dep. of Soil, Crop, and Atmospheric Sci., Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA

wjc3{at}cornell.edu

Economics is the dominant factor influencing the adoption of cropping systems. The objective of this 6-yr study was to determine profitability of cropping systems featuring four crop rotations (continuous corn (Zea mays L.), soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]–corn, soybean–corn–corn, and soybean–wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/red clover (Trifolium pratense L.)–corn), three tillage systems (moldboard, chisel, and ridge) and two management input (high and low chemical) systems. The soybean–corn rotation under low chemical management resulted in the greatest net returns in chisel ($100 ha-1) and moldboard plow tillage ($148 ha-1) because the reduction in production costs (~$110 ha-1), associated with less fertilizer and pesticide costs in corn and less herbicide costs in soybeans, offset the reduction in gross returns ($72 ha-1 in chisel and $38 ha-1 in moldboard plow), associated with lower corn and soybean yields in chisel and lower corn yields in moldboard plow. Continuous corn under high chemical and soybean–corn–corn and soybean–corn rotations under low chemical management had similar net returns in ridge tillage ($33, $26, and $17 ha-1, respectively). Growers who substitute soybean–corn and soybean–corn–corn (in ridge) rotations for continuous corn can maximize profits and reduce starter fertilizer use by 33 to 50%, N fertilizer by 60 to 70%, herbicides by about 60%, and insecticides by 65 to 100%. Growers who use moldboard plow tillage may realize maximum profits by adopting the soybean–wheat/red clover–corn rotation under low chemical management if they market the wheat straw, a common practice in New York.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. F. Stanger, J. G. Lauer, and J.-P. Chavas
The Profitability and Risk of Long-Term Cropping Systems Featuring Different Rotations and Nitrogen Rates
Agron. J., January 11, 2008; 100(1): 105 - 113.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. M. Sulc and B. F. Tracy
Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems in the U.S. Corn Belt
Agron. J., February 6, 2007; 99(2): 335 - 345.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
L. R. Gibson, C. D. Nance, and D. L. Karlen
Winter Triticale Response to Nitrogen Fertilization when Grown after Corn or Soybean
Agron. J., January 1, 2007; 99(1): 49 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Soil Sci.Home page
R. T. Venterea, J. M. Baker, M. S. Dolan, and K. A. Spokas
Carbon and Nitrogen Storage are Greater under Biennial Tillage in a Minnesota Corn-Soybean Rotation
Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., August 22, 2006; 70(5): 1752 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. Meyer-Aurich, K. Janovicek, W. Deen, and A. Weersink
Impact of Tillage and Rotation on Yield and Economic Performance in Corn-Based Cropping Systems
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1204 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. W. Singer, M. D. Casler, and K. A. Kohler
Wheat Effect on Frost-Seeded Red Clover Cultivar Establishment and Yield
Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 265 - 269.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. L. Pikul Jr., L. Hammack, and W. E. Riedell
Corn Yield, Nitrogen Use, and Corn Rootworm Infestation of Rotations in the Northern Corn Belt
Agron. J., May 13, 2005; 97(3): 854 - 863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo and W. J. Cox
Tillage Rotation Management Interactions in Corn
Agron. J., May 1, 2000; 92(3): 493 - 500.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.