HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (14) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Steinberg, S. L. Articles by Henninger, D. L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Steinberg, S. L. Articles by Henninger, D. L. Agricola Articles by Steinberg, S. L. Articles by Henninger, D. L. Related Collections Zeoponics Crop Growth and Development Other Cropping Systems Wheat

ZEOPONICS

Wheat Response to Differences in Water and Nutritional Status between Zeoponic and Hydroponic Growth Systems

^a Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, NASA, Houston, TX 77058 USA

bdwright{at}ghgcorp.com

Hydroponic culture has traditionally been used for controlled environment life support systems (CELSS) because the optimal environment for roots supports high growth rates. Recent developments in zeoponic substrate and microporous tube irrigation (ZPT) also offer high control of the root environment. This study compared the effect of differences in water and nutrient status of ZPT or hydroponic culture on growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. cv. USU-Apogee). In a side-by-side test in a controlled environment, wheat was grown in ZPT and recirculating hydroponics to maturity. Water use by plants grown in both culture systems peaked at 15 to 20 L m^-2 d^-1 up to Day 40, after which it declined more rapidly for plants grown in ZPT culture due to earlier senescence of leaves. No consistent differences in water status were noted between plants grown in the two culture systems. Although yield was similar, harvest index was 28% lower for plants grown in ZPT than in hydroponic culture. Sterile green tillers made up 12 and 0% of the biomass of plants grown in ZPT and hydroponic culture, respectively. Differences in biomass partitioning were attributed primarily to NH₄–N nutrition of plants grown in ZPT compared with NO₃–N in hydroponic nutrient solution. It is probable that NH₄–N-induced Ca deficiency produced excess tillering and lower harvest index for plants grown in ZPT culture. These results suggest that further refinements in zeoponic substrate would make ZPT culture a viable alternative for achieving high productivity in a CELSS.

Abbreviations: CELSS, controlled environment life support system(s) • LAI, leaf area index • ZPT, zeoponic substrate and microporous tube irrigation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				B. Sutter, L. R. Hossner, and D. W. Ming Dissolution Kinetics of Iron-, Manganese-, and Copper-Containing Synthetic Hydroxyapatites Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2005; 69(2): 362 - 370. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Sutter, D. W. Ming, A. Clearfield, and L. R. Hossner Mineralogical and Chemical Characterization of Iron-, Manganese-, and Copper-Containing Synthetic Hydroxyapatites Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2003; 67(6): 1935 - 1942. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Sutter, T. Wasowicz, T. Howard, L. R. Hossner, and D. W. Ming Characterization of Iron, Manganese, and Copper Synthetic Hydroxyapatites by Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., July 1, 2002; 66(4): 1359 - 1366. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Sutter, R. E. Taylor, L. R. Hossner, and D. W. Ming Solid State 31Phosphorus Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Iron-, Manganese-, and Copper-Containing Synthetic Hydroxyapatites Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2002; 66(2): 455 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]