Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holden, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Holden, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, J. A.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Holden, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shaffer, J. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Forage Management
Right arrow Other Forage Crops
Agronomy Journal 92:191-194 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

FORAGES

Comparison of `Grasslands Puna' Chicory and Orchardgrass for Multiple Harvests at Different Management Levels

Lisa A. Holdena, Gabriella A. Vargaa, Gerry A. Jung{dagger},b and John A. Shafferb

a Dep. of Dairy and Animal Sci., The Pennsylvania State Univ., University Park, PA 16802 USA
b Pasture Systems and Watershed Management Res. Lab., University Park, PA 16802 USA

lholden{at}das.psu.edu

The objective was to compare the nutrient composition of `Grasslands Puna' chicory (Puna) (Cichorium intybus L.) and `Pennlate' orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) at different levels of harvesting management. The two herbages were harvested multiple times at three different management levels, intense, moderate, and lenient, corresponding to chicory canopy management levels of 25, 37, and 50 cm, and clipped to a 5-cm stubble height. The experimental design was a 2 x 3 (species x management) factorial with five replications. Nitrogen was applied after each harvest except the last harvest of the season. Herbages were freeze-dried and ground prior to analyses for organic matter (OM), acid-detergent fiber (ADF), neutral-detergent fiber (NDF), nonstructural carbohydrate (NSC), crude protein (CP), degradable protein (DP), and soluble protein (SP). Organic matter, ADF, and NDF concentrations were lower (P < 0.05) in chicory than in orchardgrass in both years. Chicory herbage contained less than 5 g kg-1 hemicellulose. Orchardgrass had less (P < 0.05) DP than chicory in 1992 but not in 1993. Increasing intensity of management (lenient, moderate, or intense) resulted in increased CP, SP, and DP during both 1992 and 1993. Overall, Puna chicory was a high-quality forage, equal to or better than orchardgrass in quality under these harvest conditions.

Abbreviations: ADF, acid-detergent fiber • CP, crude protein • DP, degradable protein • NDF, neutral-detergent fiber • NSC, nonstructural carbohydrate • OM, organic matter • SP, soluble protein




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. Labreveux, M. A. Sanderson, and M. H. Hall
Forage Chicory and Plantain: Nutritive Value of Herbage at Variable Grazing Frequencies and Intensities
Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 231 - 237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. Labreveux, M. H. Hall, and M. A. Sanderson
Productivity of Chicory and Plantain Cultivars under Grazing
Agron. J., May 1, 2004; 96(3): 710 - 716.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.