HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (4) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by McFarland, J.B. Articles by Mitchell, R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by McFarland, J.B. Articles by Mitchell, R. Agricola Articles by McFarland, J.B. Articles by Mitchell, R. Related Collections Forage Management Other Forage Crops Nutrient Cycling

FORAGES

Fire Effects on Weeping Lovegrass Tiller Density and Demographics

^a Dep. of Range, Wildlife, and Fisheries Management, Texas Tech Univ., Lubbock, TX 79409-2125 USA

c7mrb{at}ttacs.ttu.edu

Prescribed burning is a common management practice applied to weeping lovegrass [Eragrostis curvula (Schrad.) Nees], but little is known about tiller density and demographic response to burning. Our objectives were to determine fire effects on weeping lovegrass tiller density and demographics on a site, seeded in 1989, in western Texas. Tillers were sampled at 14-d intervals in 1996 and 1997 to determine tiller density and demographics. Tiller density response to burning differed between years. Burning increased tiller density 61% compared with no burning in 1996, but did not affect tiller density in 1997. In 1996, tiller density ranged from 1068 to 2052 and 1623 to 2617 tillers m^-2 in nonburned and burned areas, respectively. In 1997, tiller density ranged from 1337 to 2398 and 1313 to 2027 tillers m^-2 in nonburned and burned areas, respectively. Tillers in nonburned and burned areas remained primarily vegetative throughout each growing season with few tillers advancing to reproductive and seed-ripening stages, likely a response to poor fertility on the site. Burning increased reproductive tiller numbers by 238% compared with no burning in 1996, but few advanced to the seed-ripening stage. In 1997, most reproductive tillers advanced to the seed-ripening stage, likely responding to precipitation. Burning apparently altered the light environment and increased nutrient availability to weeping lovegrass. Yearly variation in the response to burning of weeping lovegrass tiller density and tiller demographics demonstrates that management must be based on current tiller populations.

Abbreviations: CRP, Conservation Reserve Program • DOY, day of the year

This article has been cited by other articles:

				R. Mitchell, J. Fritz, K. Moore, L. Moser, K. Vogel, D. Redfearn, and D. Wester Predicting Forage Quality in Switchgrass and Big Bluestem Agron. J., January 1, 2001; 93(1): 118 - 124. [Abstract] [Full Text]