Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bednarz, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bednarz, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. M.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Bednarz, C. W.
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Cotton
Right arrow Plant Analysis
Agronomy Journal 92:128-135 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

COTTON

Analysis of Cotton Yield Stability Across Population Densities

Craig W. Bednarza, David C. Bridgesb and Steve M. Brownc

a University of Georgia, Coastal Plain Experiment Station, P.O. Box 748, Tifton, GA 31793 USA
b University of Georgia, Georgia Station, 1109 Experiment St., Griffin, GA 30223 USA
c University of Georgia, Rural Development Center, P.O. Box 1209, Tifton, GA 31793 USA

cbednarz{at}tifton.cpes.peachnet.edu

Final lint yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) is relatively stable across a wide range of population densities. This study was conducted to determine (i) which components of final lint yield impart this yield stability across plant populations and (ii) how yield distribution is influenced by population density. Studies were conducted in 1997 and 1998 on a Tifton loamy sand (Fine-loamy, kaolinitic, thermic Plinthic Kandiudults). Cotton was planted in each study on 91-cm row widths at seeding rates ranging from 3.5 to 25.1 seeds m-2. At harvest, each plot was hand picked and boll numbers and weights were recorded at each monopodial branch and sympodial branch fruiting position. Lower population densities led to plants with more mainstem nodes and monopodial branches with increased fruit retention, resulting in greater fruit production per plant. Boll size was inversely related to population density. Mean net assimilation rate from first flower to peak bloom also was related inversely to population density. The mainstem node of peak boll set increased with population density. Fruit production on a ground area basis was greater in the first sympodial position as population density increased, while fruit production on a ground area basis in third positions and monopodial branches was greater as population density decreased. Accumulative seedcotton from sympodial branches also increased with population density. Total fruit number and seedcotton yield per area were not influenced by population density in these studies. Yield stability across population densities was achieved through manipulation of boll occurrence and weight.

Abbreviations: LAI, leaf area index • PPFD, photosynthetic photon flux density • NAR, net assimilation rate




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. L. Clawson, J. T. Cothren, D. C. Blouin, and J. L. Satterwhite
Timing of Maturity in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Cotton as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer Rate
Agron. J., February 29, 2008; 100(2): 421 - 431.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. W. Katsvairo, D. L. Wright, J. J. Marois, D. L. Hartzog, K. B. Balkcom, P. P. Wiatrak, and J. R. Rich
Performance of Peanut and Cotton in a Bahiagrass Cropping System
Agron. J., August 10, 2007; 99(5): 1245 - 1251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. D. Siebert and A. M. Stewart
Influence of Plant Density on Cotton Response to Mepiquat Chloride Application
Agron. J., October 31, 2006; 98(6): 1634 - 1639.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. W. Bednarz, R. L. Nichols, and S. M. Brown
Plant Density Modifications of Cotton Within-Boll Yield Components
Crop Sci., September 8, 2006; 46(5): 2076 - 2080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. H. Schomberg, R. G. McDaniel, E. Mallard, D. M. Endale, D. S. Fisher, and M. L. Cabrera
Conservation Tillage and Cover Crop Influences on Cotton Production on a Southeastern U.S. Coastal Plain Soil
Agron. J., August 3, 2006; 98(5): 1247 - 1256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
J. D. Siebert, A. M. Stewart, and B. R. Leonard
Comparative Growth and Yield of Cotton Planted at Various Densities and Configurations
Agron. J., April 11, 2006; 98(3): 562 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
C. W. Bednarz, R. L. Nichols, and S. M. Brown
Plant Density Modifies Within-Canopy Cotton Fiber Quality
Crop Sci., February 24, 2006; 46(2): 950 - 956.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
T. L. Grey, G. D. Buntin, P. M. Roberts, and D. C. Bridges
Potential Interaction of Pendimethalin and Systemic Insecticides for Thrips Control in Cotton
Agron. J., January 5, 2006; 98(1): 141 - 147.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. L. Clawson, J. T. Cothren, and D. C. Blouin
Nitrogen Fertilization and Yield of Cotton in Ultra-Narrow and Conventional Row Spacings
Agron. J., January 3, 2006; 98(1): 72 - 79.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. Tewolde, K. R. Sistani, D. E. Rowe, A. Adeli, and T. Tsegaye
ESTIMATING COTTON LEAF AREA INDEX NONDESTRUCTIVELY WITH A LIGHT SENSOR
Agron. J., June 17, 2005; 97(4): 1158 - 1163.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
C. W. Bednarz, W. D. Shurley, W. S. Anthony, and R. L. Nichols
Yield, Quality, and Profitability of Cotton Produced at Varying Plant Densities
Agron. J., January 1, 2005; 97(1): 235 - 240.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. J. Boquet, R. L. Hutchinson, and G. A. Breitenbeck
Long-Term Tillage, Cover Crop, and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Cotton: Plant Growth and Yield Components
Agron. J., September 1, 2004; 96(5): 1443 - 1452.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Crop Sci.Home page
J. J. Marois, D. L. Wright, P. J. Wiatrak, and M. A. Vargas
Effect of Row Width and Nitrogen on Cotton Morphology and Canopy Microclimate
Crop Sci., May 1, 2004; 44(3): 870 - 877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
H. H. Schomberg, G. W. Langdale, A. J. Franzluebbers, and M. C. Lamb
Comparison of Tillage Types and Frequencies for Cotton on Southern Piedmont Soil
Agron. J., September 1, 2003; 95(5): 1281 - 1287.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
G. D. Buntin, P. L. Raymer, C. W. Bednarz, D. V. Phillips, and R. E. Baird
Winter Crop, Tillage, and Planting Date Effects on Double-Crop Cotton
Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 273 - 280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.