Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shock, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Shock, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. G.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Shock, C. C.
Right arrow Articles by Miller, J. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Soil Fertility and Productivity
Right arrow Crop Rotation Systems
Right arrow Sugarbeet
Right arrow Other Crops
Agronomy Journal 92:10-15 (2000)
© 2000 American Society of Agronomy

SOIL FERTILITY

Sugarbeet Nitrogen Uptake and Performance Following Heavily Fertilized Onion

Clinton C. Shocka, Majid Seddigha, Lamont D. Saundersa, Timothy D. Stiebera and John G. Millera

a Malheur Exp. Stn., Oregon State Univ., Ontario, OR 97914 USA

clinton.shock{at}orst.edu

Received for publication October 7, 1998. Crop over-fertilization has economic and environmental consequences. Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) N fertilizer requirements could be lower than expected when planted after shallow rooted onion (Allium cepa L.). Sugarbeet was planted on an Owyhee silt loam (coarse-silty, mixed, mesic Xerollic Durorthid) for 2 yr, where the previous onion crop had received 0, 60, 120, 240, and 480 kg N ha-1. Soil nitrate and ammonium were measured in 0.3-m increments to 1.8 m deep after harvesting onion, and before and after growing sugarbeet. Nitrogen uptake by plant parts, and beet and sucrose yields, were measured. Averaged across years, sugarbeet recovered 336, 316, 338, 400, and 505 kg N ha-1 when N fertilizer of the previous onion crop was 0, 60, 120, 240, and 480 kg ha-1, respectively. The corresponding reduction in available inorganic N from the top 1.8 m of the soil during sugarbeet growth was 27, 82, 62, 120, and 152 kg ha-1. Nitrogen recovered by sugarbeet was largely supplied by sources other than preplant available N. Recovered sucrose yield was near maximum when the N rate on the previous onion crop was 240 kg ha-1, which resulted in preplant NO3–N levels of about 70 kg ha-1 in the top 0.6 m of the soil. Sucrose yield did not improve when petiole NO3–N in late June exceeded 6 g kg-1. In conclusion, sugarbeet may not require fertilizer N when grown after onion fertilized with about 240 kg N ha-1.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson, F. C. Schweissing, M. E. Bartolo, and C. A. Reule
Corn Response to Nitrogen Fertilization in a Soil with High Residual Nitrogen
Agron. J., July 13, 2005; 97(4): 1222 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
M. Bilbao, J. J. Martinez, and A. Delgado
Evaluation of Soil Nitrate as a Predictor of Nitrogen Requirement for Sugar Beet Grown in a Mediterranean Climate
Agron. J., January 1, 2004; 96(1): 18 - 25.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson, R. F. Follett, M. E. Bartolo, and F. C. Schweissing
Nitrogen Fertilizer Use Efficiency of Furrow-Irrigated Onion and Corn
Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 442 - 449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Journal of
Environmental Quality
Copyright © 2000 by the American Society of Agronomy.