Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1999
Published in Agron J 91:946-949 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text Free
Right arrow Full Text (PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Balchin, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Balchin, D.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Dwyer, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Balchin, D.
Related Collections
Right arrow Agroclimatology
Right arrow Crop Growth and Development
Right arrow Maize
Agronomy Journal 91:946-949 (1999)
© 1999 American Society of Agronomy

GRAIN AND OIL CROPS

Guidelines for Comparisons among Different Maize Maturity Rating Systems

Lianne M. Dwyera, Douglas W. Stewarta, L. Carriganb, B.L. Maa, P. Neavea and D. Balchina

a Agric. & Agri-Food Canada, Eastern Cereal & Oilseed Res. Ctr., Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6, Canada
b Pioneer Hi-Bred Int., Plant Breeding Div., Willmar, MN, 56201 USA

dwyerl{at}em.agr.ca

Several systems are extensively used to rate maize (Zea mays L.) maturity in North America, including growing degree days, crop heat units, and Minnesota relative maturity rating days. Correspondence between the different systems varies with the temperature range of the environment, because of different bases of calculation and unit size. However, general guidelines for conversion from one system to another would aid communication among researchers, producers, distributors, and extension personnel, particularly where regional preference for one system exists, but information developed in another region is shared. Simple regression equations were developed from a data set with 4 years, 28 hybrids, and 19 locations (between 39° and 48° N lat). Coefficients of determination were >=0.91, indicating that these equations could be used as a general guideline to compare maturity ratings developed using the different systems.

Abbreviations: CHU, crop heat units • GDD, growing degree days • GTI, general thermal index • MRMR, Minnesota relative maturity rating




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
R. L. Nielsen, P. R. Thomison, G. A. Brown, A. L. Halter, J. Wells, and K. L. Wuethrich
Delayed Planting Effects on Flowering and Grain Maturation of Dent Corn
Agron. J., May 1, 2002; 94(3): 549 - 558.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1999 by the American Society of Agronomy.