HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Figures Only Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Baumhardt, R.L. Articles by Lascano, R. J. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Baumhardt, R.L. Articles by Lascano, R. J. Agricola Articles by Baumhardt, R.L. Articles by Lascano, R. J. Related Collections Intercropping Systems Dryland Cropping Systems Cotton Wheat Agricultural Systems Soil Conservation

INTEGRATED SOIL AND CROP MANAGEMENT

Water Budget and Yield of Dryland Cotton Intercropped with Terminated Winter Wheat

^a USDA-ARS, Conservation and Production Res. Lab., P.O. Drawer 10, Bushland, TX 79012-0010 USA
^b Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., Route 3, Box 219, Lubbock, TX 79401-9757 USA

lbaumhar{at}ag.gov

A Texas South Plains production system for reducing wind erosion in irrigated cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), a low-residue crop, is to plant winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) after cotton harvest, chemically terminate the wheat in the spring, and plant cotton using conservation tillage. The terminated wheat–cotton system (TWC) utilizes fall rain to grow wheat residue. This system has increased irrigated cotton lint yields compared with continuous clean-tillage cotton (CCC), but there is limited information on the annual water budget and adaptability of TWC under dryland conditions. This study compares CCC and TWC effects on (i) runoff and infiltration of rain, (ii) the annual water balance, and (iii) cotton lint yield under dryland conditions. The water budget of TWC and CCC was measured in 3- by 30–m subplot watersheds from May 1992 to December 1995 on an Amarillo sandy loam (fine-loamy, mixed, thermic Aridic Paleustalf) at Wellman, TX. Compared with CCC plots, the TWC residue reduced average annual runoff by 43 mm, but increased average fallow water use by 28 mm (for growing wheat). The use of TWC did not significantly increase either water conservation or cotton lint yields compared with CCC. Cotton establishment was problematic, due to limited soil water at planting in 1993 for TWC and CCC. This prevented 1994 TWC cotton establishment, thus offsetting improved establishment in 1992, when residue protected cotton seedlings during above-average rain. In semiarid regions, inadequate soil water for crop establishment is an uncontrolled risk with dryland TWC production. Because no significant gains in water storage or cotton lint yield were observed under dryland conditions with TWC compared with CCC, undertaking the greater crop establishment risk with TWC cotton production is not recommended in the Texas South Plains.

Abbreviations: CCC, continuous clean-tillage cotton • DOY, day of year • ET, evaporation and transpiration • P, precipitation • R, runoff • S, soil water • TWC, terminated wheat–cotton • WUE, water use efficiency

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Cherr, J. M. S. Scholberg, and R. McSorley Green Manure Approaches to Crop Production: A Synthesis Agron. J., February 7, 2006; 98(2): 302 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.L. Baumhardt, P.W. Unger, and T.H. Dao Seedbed Surface Geometry Effects on Soil Crusting and Seedling Emergence Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1112 - 1117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]