HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Free Full Text (PDF) Free Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (10) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Welsh, R. Articles by Hubbell, B. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Welsh, R. Articles by Hubbell, B. Agricola Articles by Welsh, R. Articles by Hubbell, B. Related Collections Other Pollution Animal Waste

FORUM

Contract Hog Production and Environmental Management in the Southern United States

^a Henry A. Wallace Inst. for Alternative Agriculture, 9200 Edmonston Rd., Ste. 117, Greenbelt, MD 20770-1551 USA
^b Innovative Strategies and Economics Group, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, USEPA, Durham, NC USA

hawiaa{at}access.digex.net

The 1980s and 1990s have witnessed substantial changes in the U.S. swine industry. The industry structure has shifted from relatively large numbers of hog (Sus scrofa) farm operators producing for open markets to fewer and larger farm operators raising hogs under contracts for intermediary firms or meatpackers. This shift has resulted in debates over whether the movement from independent to contract hog production has proven beneficial or detrimental for manure management and pollution control. To shed light on these debates, we surveyed by mail independent and contract hog producers in the southern USA and gathered data on the structure of their farms, their opinions on environmental issues in the hog industry, and their manure management strategies. The survey results indicate that contract producers maintain higher animal units per hectare and spread the hog manure over smaller areas than do independents. However, contract producers also realize they are pushing the adsorptive capacity of their farms and adopt ameliorating and monitoring technologies at higher rates than independent producers. We conclude that market structure is an important determinant of farm structure and environmental management regime, and that adoption of pollution control technologies is not equivalent to environmental performance.

Abbreviations: AEU, animal equivalent unit

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. R. McLaughlin, T. E. Fairbrother, and D. E. Rowe Forage Yield and Nutrient Uptake of Warm-Season Annual Grasses in a Swine Effluent Spray Field Agron. J., November 1, 2004; 96(6): 1516 - 1522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. E. Brink, D. E. Rowe, K. R. Sistani, and A. Adeli Bermudagrass Cultivar Response to Swine Effluent Application Agron. J., May 1, 2003; 95(3): 597 - 601. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]