| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Dep. of Crop Sciences, 1102 S. Goodwin Ave., Univ. of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801.
* Corresponding author (dbullock{at}uiuc.edu).
The choice of an optimal interpolation technique for estimating soil properties at unsampled locations is an important issue in site-specific management. The objective of this study was to evaluate inverse distance (InvD) weighting, ordinary kriging (KO), and lognormal ordinary kriging (KOlog) to determine the optimal interpolation method for mapping soil properties. Relationships between statistical properties of the data and performance of the methods were analyzed using soil test P and K data from 30 agricultural fields. For InvD weighting, we used powers of 1,2,3, and 4. The numbers of the closest neighboring points ranged from 5 to 30 for the three methods. The results suggest that KOlog can improve estimation precision compared with KO for lognormally distributed data. The criteria helpful in deciding whether KOlog is applicable for the given data set were the Kolmogorov-Smirnov goodness-of-fit statistic, coefficient of variation, skewness, kurtosis, and the size of the data set. Careful choice of the exponent value for InvD weighting and of the number of the closest neighbors for both InvD weighting and kriging (KO or KOlog) significantly improved the estimation accuracy (P
0.05). However, no a priori decision could be made about the optimal exponent and the number of the closest neighbors based on the statistical properties of the data. For the majority of the data sets, kriging with the optimal number of the neighboring points, a carefully selected variogram model, and appropriate log-transformation of the data performed better than InvD weighting. Correlation coefficients between experimental data and estimated results of kriging were higher than those of InvD for 57 out of a total of 60 data sets, kriging mean absolute errors were lower for 44 data sets, and kriging mean errors were lower than those of InvD weighting for 31 data sets.
Received for publication December 30, 1997.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. M. Elprince Prediction Soil Fertilization Maps Using Logistic Modeling and a Geographical Information System Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., October 21, 2009; 73(6): 2032 - 2042. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. M. Brouder, B. S. Hofmann, and D. K. Morris Mapping Soil pH: Accuracy of Common Soil Sampling Strategies and Estimation Techniques Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., March 1, 2005; 69(2): 427 - 442. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. G. Mueller, N. B. Pusuluri, K. K. Mathias, P. L. Cornelius, and R. I. Barnhisel Site-Specific Soil Fertility Management: A Model for Map Quality Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 2031 - 2041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. G. Mueller, N. B. Pusuluri, K. K. Mathias, P. L. Cornelius, R. I. Barnhisel, and S. A. Shearer Map Quality for Ordinary Kriging and Inverse Distance Weighted Interpolation Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., November 1, 2004; 68(6): 2042 - 2047. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Chang, D. E. Clay, C. G. Carlson, S. A. Clay, D. D. Malo, R. Berg, J. Kleinjan, and W. Wiebold Different Techniques to Identify Management Zones Impact Nitrogen and Phosphorus Sampling Variability Agron. J., November 1, 2003; 95(6): 1550 - 1559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Kravchenko Influence of Spatial Structure on Accuracy of Interpolation Methods Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2003; 67(5): 1564 - 1571. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
D. L. Corwin, S. M. Lesch, P. J. Shouse, R. Soppe, and J. E. Ayars Identifying Soil Properties that Influence Cotton Yield Using Soil Sampling Directed by Apparent Soil Electrical Conductivity Agron. J., March 1, 2003; 95(2): 352 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. Kastens, J. P. Schmidt, and K. C. Dhuyvetter Yield Models Implied by Traditional Fertilizer Recommendations and a Framework for Including Nontraditional Information Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2003; 67(1): 351 - 364. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Kravchenko, G. A. Bollero, R. A. Omonode, and D. G. Bullock Quantitative Mapping of Soil Drainage Classes Using Topographical Data and Soil Electrical Conductivity Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., January 1, 2002; 66(1): 235 - 243. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. G. Mueller, F. J. Pierce, O. Schabenberger, and D. D. Warncke Map Quality for Site-Specific Fertility Management Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., September 1, 2001; 65(5): 1547 - 1558. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. N. Kravchenko, C. W. Boast, and D. G. Bullock Multifractal Analysis of Soil Spatial Variability Agron. J., November 1, 1999; 91(6): 1033 - 1041. [Abstract] [Full Text]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| The SCI Journals | Crop Science | Vadose Zone Journal | |||
| Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education |
Soil Science Society of America Journal | ||||
| Journal of Plant Registrations | Journal of Environmental Quality |
The Plant Genome | |||
