HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (26) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Makowski, D. Articles by Meynard, J.-M. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Makowski, D. Articles by Meynard, J.-M. Agricola Articles by Makowski, D. Articles by Meynard, J.-M.

Models of Yield, Grain Protein, and Residual Mineral Nitrogen Responses to Applied Nitrogen for Winter Wheat

unité d'agronomie, INRA, B.P. 27, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan, France;

Jean-Marc Meynard

laboratoire d'agronomie, INRA INA P-G, BP 01 78850 Thiverval-Grignon, France.

^* Corresponding author (wallach{at}toulouse.inra.fr).

The proper use of N fertilizer is fundamental for farm profitability and environmental protection. In France, fertilizer recommendations are generally based on the balance-sheet method, which is not sensitive to the economic or regulatory context. A way to generalize the balance-sheet method is to use models that describe crop response to applied N. The goal of this paper is to propose, in the case of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), functional forms for the response of yield, grain protein content, and residual mineral N left in the soil at harvest to applied N. The originality of our models is that all three responses (yield, protein, and residual mineral N) are modeled, using N uptake as an intermediate variable. Furthermore, these models have two clear links with the balance-sheet method. First, the parameters of the balance-sheet method appear explicitly in the models. Second, the N dose recommended by the balance-sheet method appears in our models as the smallest N dose that maximizes yield. Within this general modeling framework, three variants of the yield model, three variants of the grain protein content model, and two variants of the residual mineral N model are considered. The different models are adjusted, site-year by site-year, to 28 site-years of data. All models give satisfactory fits to the data. For example, the root mean square error varies between 0.21 and 0.23 Mg ha^–1 for the yield models. Almost all the adjusted parameter values vary widely from site-year to site-year. This must be taken into account when calculating optimal N doses for new site-years.

Received for publication December 30, 1997.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L. M. Arregui and M. Quemada Strategies to Improve Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Winter Cereal Crops under Rainfed Conditions Agron. J., February 26, 2008; 100(2): 277 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Takahashi, M. R. Anwar, and S. G. de Vera Effects of Compost and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Wheat Nitrogen Use in Japanese Soils Agron. J., June 26, 2007; 99(4): 1151 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Alvarez, H. S. Steinbach, S. M. Grigera, E. Cartier, G. Obregon, S. Torri, and R. Garcia The Balance Sheet Method as a Conceptual Framework for Nitrogen Fertilization of Wheat in a Pampean Agroecosystem Agron. J., July 1, 2004; 96(4): 1050 - 1057. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. Makowski, D. Wallach, and J.-M. Meynard Statistical Methods for Predicting Responses to Applied Nitrogen and Calculating Optimal Nitrogen Rates Agron. J., May 1, 2001; 93(3): 531 - 539. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]