HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bowers, G. R. Articles by Strayer, J. R. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Bowers, G. R. Articles by Strayer, J. R. Agricola Articles by Bowers, G. R. Articles by Strayer, J. R.

Comparison of Three Methods for Estimating Defoliation in Soybean Breeding Programs

Texas A&M Univ., 1509 Aggie Dr., Beaumont, TX 77713-8530
American Cyanamid Co., Collierville, TN 38017
Texas A&M Univ., 1509 Aggie Dr., Beaumont, TX 77713-8530
North Florida Res. & Educ. Ctr., Univ. of Florida, Quincy, FL 32351
Dep. of Entomology and Nematology, Univ. of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32565

^* Corresponding author (grbowers{at}purdue.edu).

The proper assessment of defoliation by phytophagous insects in soybean [Glycine mar (L.) Merr.] is required when screening germplasm for insect resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and relative efficiency of the widely used visual or relative assessment of insect defoliation compared with a more quantitative assessment for use in soybean breeding programs. In 1985 and 1991, visual assessments (whole plot, 1985; whole plant and average of partitioned plant, 1991) were compared with an established quantitative assessment. Twenty leaflets were randomly removed from each of the upper, middle, and lower thirds of the canopy of each plot. These leaflets were compared with a template of known defoliation in 1985. In 1991, a leaf area meter was used to determine the actual amount of defoliation of each plant. In 1990 and 1991, two types of visual estimates (whole plant and average of partitioned plant) were also compared with each other. Sampling time was estimated for each method. Estimates between visual and quantitative assessments were highly correlated each year. Precision was similar for each method. Sampling time for the visual assessment was at least 30 times faster than the quantitative assessment. The results of these studies show that relative estimates can he used to assess insect defoliation accurately and quickly.

Received for publication March 9, 1998.