Agronomy Journal Grow Your Career With ASA
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 November 1998
Published in Agron J 90:845-850 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McInnes, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by McInnes, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, J. L.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by McInnes, K. J.
Right arrow Articles by Heilman, J. L.

Separation and Dispersion of Conditionally Sampled Eddies through an Intake Tube

Kevin J. McInnes*, C. S. Campbell and James L. Heilman

Dep. of Soil and Crop Sciences, Texas A&M Univ., College Station, TX 77843-2474

* Corresponding author (k-mcinnes{at}tamu.edu).

With conditional sampling, atmospheric fluxes are estimated from the difference in mean concentration of a gas between upward and downward moving eddies and a measure of the standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity. Two basic components of a conditional sampling system are a sonic anemometer to measure the direction and standard deviation of the vertical wind velocity, and a valve to separate air sampled from updrafts and downdrafts. Use of the Campbell Scientific CSAT3 three-axis sonic anemometer to measure the vertical direction of the eddies and to trigger a splitter valve requires building a physical delay into the air sampling line to counter the electronic delay that is built into the anemometer. This physical delay in the form of an intake tube creates a source of dispersion that may reduce concentration differences and affect estimates of fluxes. Our objectives were to determine the proper match of electronic and physical delays to separate eddies, and then to measure the amount of dispersion from the combined mixing in the tube and the splitter valve. A conditional sampling system to measure CO2 fluxes was constructed using a CSAT3 anemometer and a three-way valve. A physical delay was created by adding tubing on the upstream side of the valve. A simple timing circuit was used to control a highspeed valve that pulsed CO2 in front of the intake tube to mark the locations of eddy transitions. Differences in concentrations between updraft and downdraft fines were measured as flow rates and electronic delays were varied. Tube length based on electronic delay, flow rate, and intake tube geometry was found to be adequate for separation of updrafts and downdrafts. Dispersion in the intake tube was significant and predictable. The effect of the splitter valve on dispersion was minimal. A correction factor to adjust concentration differences in the lines for dispersion may be warranted, but only for eddy reversal frequencies > 2 Hz.


Research conducted by the Texas Agric. Exp. Stn., the Texas A&M Univ. System. Partial support was provided by institutional grant No. NA56RG0388 to Texas A&M University from the National Sea Grant Office, U.S. Dep. of Commerce, and by Grant no. 97-35101-4320 from the USDA-NRI.

Received for publication January 21, 1998.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy.