HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Sweeney, D. W. Articles by Pontius, J. S. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Sweeney, D. W. Articles by Pontius, J. S. Agricola Articles by Sweeney, D. W. Articles by Pontius, J. S.

Agricultural Advisory Committees: How They Rate Their Effectiveness in Guiding Research

Kansas State Univ., Southeast Agric. Res. Ctr., P.O. Box 316, Parsons, KS 67357
Kansas State Univ., Dep. of Statistics, Manhattan, KS 66506

^* Corresponding author (dsweeney{at}oznet.ksu.edu)

University faculty located and conducting research at off-campus agricultural research centers often are advised by committees representing agribusiness, producers, and extension personnel. A two-page questionnaire was sent in 1996 to the directors, faculty, and members of the advisory committees of three research centers each in Arkansas, Florida, Minnesota, Nebraska, and Texas and two research centers in Kansas to assess opinions about the composition, structure, goals, and effectiveness of agricultural advisory committees. All occupational groups surveyed felt that advisory committees can provide valuable input for agricultural research, but were less convinced that they accomplish their goals, in general, research center directors, extension personnel, and research faculty tended to be more reserved than agribusiness and producer respondents in their opinions on the performance of advisory committees. Respondents believed that agricultural research advisory committees should comprise representatives of agribusiness, area producers, extension personnel, and research faculty who are chosen by those groups, although research center directors did not support extension personnel or research faculty having a voice in the selection process. Committee members should serve a term of 3 to 4 years. Goals should be more defined and should help to identify needs and guide research by providing direction and focus, being an advocate for the research center, and providing input on fund raising and management. Improved communication, more meetings with definite agendas, and better attendance were identified to help improve the success of advisory committees. Overall, the potential for benefit is high, but agricultural advisory committees often are perceived as needing to improve their effectiveness.

Received for publication February 7, 1998.