Agronomy Journal Journal of Natural Resources and Life Sciences Education
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Published online 1 September 1998
Published in Agron J 90:630-637 (1998)
© 1998 American Society of Agronomy
677 S. Segoe Rd., Madison, WI 53711 USA
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.
Agricola
Right arrow Articles by Sims, A. L.
Right arrow Articles by Power, J. F.

Irrigated Corn Yield and Nitrogen Accumulation Response in a Comparison of No-till and Conventional Till: Tillage and Surface-Residue Variables

Albert L. Sims*, James S. Schepers, Robert A. Olson and James F. Power

Univ. of Minnesota, Northwest Exp. Stn., 2900 University Ave., Crookston, MN 56716
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Agronomy
Dep. of Agronomy, 119 Keim Hall-East Campus, Univ. of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68583
USDA-ARS and Dep. of Agronomy

* Corresponding author (asims{at}mail.crk.umn.edu).

Comparisons between no-till and conventional-till management are often confounded by variation in both tillage and residue placement. The objective of this research was to separate the tillage variable from the surface-residue variable associated with no-till and conventional-till management comparisons in irrigated continuous corn (Zea mays L.) production. Two Nebraska locations (Mead and Clay Center) with differences in soil types and climate were selected. Four tillage-residue treatments [NT-NR (no-till, residue removed), NT-R (no-till, surface residue), T-NR (till, residue removed), T-R (conventional till, surface residue)] were fertilized by either broadcasting at planting or sidedressing at the 6-leaf stage with rates of 0, 56, 112, and 168 kg N ha–1. At Clay Center, grain yields and total N accumulation were similar for all tillage-residue treatment combinations in all years when the highest fertilizer N rate was used. In 2 of 3 yr at Mead, grain yields and total N accumulation were less for no-till than conventionaltill treatments, but in 1 yr the yields and total N accumulations were greater in no-till than conventional-till treatments. At Mead, surface residue resulted in lower grain yields and total N accumulation compared with bare soil at lower N rates, but not at greater N rates, in 2 of 3 yr. Sidedressing fertilizer N was generally a more efficient N placement than broadcasting. Differences between tillage and residue effects at Clay Center and residue effects at Mead were overcome with higher rates of fertilizer N. Tillage effects at Mead did not appear to be N-related. The data suggest that tillage may be necessary to maintain optimum production levels on finer-textured soils when spring soil temperatures are cool and slow to warm. When spring soil temperatures are warm, no-till strategies can be used for optimum production levels on these soils.


Minn. Agric. Exp. Stn. No. 98101008

Received for publication January 21, 1998.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
D. W. Archer, A. D. Halvorson, and C. A. Reule
Economics of Irrigated Continuous Corn under Conventional-Till and No-Till in Northern Colorado
Agron. J., June 23, 2008; 100(4): 1166 - 1172.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson and C. A. Reule
Irrigated, No-Till Corn and Barley Response to Nitrogen in Northern Colorado
Agron. J., October 15, 2007; 99(6): 1521 - 1529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson and C. A. Reule
Irrigated Corn and Soybean Response to Nitrogen under No-Till in Northern Colorado
Agron. J., September 5, 2006; 98(5): 1367 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
A. D. Halvorson, A. R. Mosier, C. A. Reule, and W. C. Bausch
Nitrogen and Tillage Effects on Irrigated Continuous Corn Yields
Agron. J., January 3, 2006; 98(1): 63 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
P. R. Ernani, C. Bayer, and L. Maestri
Corn Yield as Affected by Liming and Tillage System on an Acid Brazilian Oxisol
Agron. J., March 1, 2002; 94(2): 305 - 309.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Agron. J.Home page
E. Z. Nyakatawa, K.C. Reddy, and D. A. Mays
Tillage, Cover Cropping, and Poultry Litter Effects on Cotton: II. Growth and Yield Parameters
Agron. J., September 1, 2000; 92(5): 1000 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
The SCI Journals Crop Science Vadose Zone Journal
Journal of Natural Resources
and Life Sciences Education
Soil Science Society of America Journal
Journal of Plant Registrations Journal of
Environmental Quality
The Plant Genome
Copyright © 1998 by the American Society of Agronomy.